Search for: "State v. Robinson"
Results 401 - 420
of 2,196
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Apr 2019, 4:10 am
” In the most recent episode of SCOTUStalk, Kimberly Robinson joins Amy Howe to discuss last week’s oral argument in Department of Commerce v. [read post]
29 Apr 2019, 3:04 am
Robinson v. [read post]
26 Apr 2019, 3:59 am
” Charlotte Garden analyzes Wednesday’s decision in Lamps Plus Inc. v. [read post]
25 Apr 2019, 11:24 am
Lozano v. [read post]
24 Apr 2019, 4:04 am
” At Bloomberg Law, Kimberly Robinson reports that during yesterday afternoon’s other argument, in Rehaif v. [read post]
23 Apr 2019, 1:58 pm
” Robinson v. [read post]
23 Apr 2019, 5:00 am
February 15, 2019) and Robinson v. [read post]
23 Apr 2019, 3:54 am
At Bloomberg Law, Kimberly Robinson reports that after yesterday’s oral argument in Food Marketing Institute v. [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 3:46 am
” This blog’s analysis of Tuesday’s argument in North Carolina Dept of Revenue v. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 2:22 am
Parties’ submissions Firstly, Mr Robinson submitted that the line of authority beginning with Onibiyo [1996] EWCA Civ 1338 – which established that it was for the Secretary of State to decide whether further submissions constituted a fresh claim giving rise to a right of appeal – did not survive the Supreme Court’s decision in BA (Nigeria) [2009] UKSC 7. [read post]
16 Apr 2019, 8:45 am
Supreme Court case of Robinson v. [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 3:58 am
Woodard, which involves a strip-search of a preschool child by a state caseworker. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 9:30 pm
Islam v Secretary of State for the Home Department, R v Immigration Appeal Tribunal and Another, ex parte Shah (1999) Nora Honkala72. [read post]
4 Apr 2019, 4:07 am
United States, ex rel. [read post]
29 Mar 2019, 4:10 am
” At Bloomberg Law, Kimberly Robinson reports that after Wednesday’s oral argument in Kisor v. [read post]
26 Mar 2019, 8:00 pm
Supreme Court oral argument in Rucho v. [read post]
26 Mar 2019, 2:44 pm
Benisek and Rucho v. [read post]
21 Mar 2019, 1:44 pm
., dismissed the claim of copyright infringement, stating that even if Pyrrha Design owned the copyright in the designs, Plum & Posey did not infringe it.The main questions raised by the Court in this case are the following:Does copyright subsist in any of the Pyrrha Designs because they are original artistic works? [read post]
21 Mar 2019, 4:12 am
This blog’s analysis of Tuesday’s opinion in Washington State Department of Licensing v. [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 12:19 pm
So why did Business Court Judge Robinson dismiss the UDTPA claim in the antitrust lawsuit (at the Rule 12 stage) in DiCesare v. [read post]
