Search for: "State v. Rome"
Results 141 - 160
of 701
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jan 2021, 5:49 am
The UK has wisely carried forward the rules of applicable law contained in the Rome Regulations. [read post]
31 Dec 2020, 9:01 pm
Sanford, Plessy v. [read post]
30 Dec 2020, 2:19 pm
Supreme Court decision holding that plaintiffs suing a foreign government under the statutory exception for state-sponsored terrorism can seek punitive damages for terrorism. [read post]
30 Dec 2020, 2:19 pm
Supreme Court decision holding that plaintiffs suing a foreign government under the statutory exception for state-sponsored terrorism can seek punitive damages for terrorism. [read post]
19 Dec 2020, 6:38 am
ItalyFacebook v. [read post]
9 Dec 2020, 7:53 pm
The Prosecutor reached this decision on admissibility grounds under Article 17 of the Rome Statute. [read post]
16 Nov 2020, 5:42 am
The majority (for the benefit of non-UK readers, when there is a majority the law is to be understood to be stated on this matter by that majority in a manner as authoritative as if there had been unanimity across all five judges) considered that there was no choice of an applicable law pertinent to Art.3 of Rome I in the underlying contract by which Enka’s services had been engaged. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 6:48 am
C v D [2007] EWCA Civ 1282). [read post]
9 Nov 2020, 7:00 am
The bottom line: The Commissioner held that Education Law §310 provides no basis to review an alleged act or omission by the DCCE or by the BOR or its members. * Deaccession is the official removing of an item from a public library, museum, or art gallery in order to sell it or otherwise dispose of it. ** See Matter of Board of Educ. of City School Dist. of City of Rome v. [read post]
9 Nov 2020, 7:00 am
The bottom line: The Commissioner held that Education Law §310 provides no basis to review an alleged act or omission by the DCCE or by the BOR or its members. * Deaccession is the official removing of an item from a public library, museum, or art gallery in order to sell it or otherwise dispose of it. ** See Matter of Board of Educ. of City School Dist. of City of Rome v. [read post]
4 Nov 2020, 9:02 pm
Supreme Court heard arguments in Fulton v. [read post]
30 Sep 2020, 6:15 am
Jahrhunderts v. [read post]
22 Sep 2020, 1:44 am
(Rome I Regulation) They are applied pursuant to the contract principle. [read post]
19 Sep 2020, 6:30 am
Looking around, we observe a political oligarchy (Congress) seamed with money and celebrity, hardly able to govern, increasingly irrelevant even as it remains at the heart of an old “republican” constitution; passionate demands (our commentators call them “populism”) for more than the state can summon the will or means to provide, from real economic security to dignity and recognition in a fragmented society (our commentators call it “polarization”),… [read post]
14 Sep 2020, 8:41 am
But two new sources of information—the fifth volume of the Senate Select Intelligence Committee’s bipartisan report on Russian interference in the 2016 election and New York Times reporter Michael Schmidt’s new book “Donald Trump v. the United States”—raise even more questions about the investigation. [read post]
9 Sep 2020, 1:02 am
As to the latter, the article argues that there is neither a contradiction to the ECJ’s previous decision in Google v. [read post]
14 Aug 2020, 6:45 am
United StatesJordahl v. [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 11:34 am
I love Michelangelo’s and was privileged to see his masterpieces in Rome. [read post]
4 Aug 2020, 5:02 am
Some may have misread the Johnny Depp v. [read post]
26 Jul 2020, 4:35 pm
LUISS “Guido Carli” University of Rome. [read post]
