Search for: "State v. Rome"
Results 161 - 180
of 702
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jul 2020, 4:35 pm
LUISS “Guido Carli” University of Rome. [read post]
20 Jul 2020, 1:42 am
In general, most instruments, such as the Rome Regulations, will be transposed into English domestic law. [read post]
7 Jul 2020, 4:49 pm
” The Court relied on Perinçek v. [read post]
4 Jul 2020, 9:56 am
The removal of the Alter of Victory in the Senate of Rome produced that great debate be [read post]
29 Jun 2020, 2:41 am
As a consequence, courts were urged to develop the notion of frustration of the contract, which allows for termination of an agreement when the circumstances are “in a fundamental respect different from those which were envisaged”.6)In the definition of Davis Contractos Ltd. v. [read post]
14 May 2020, 11:00 pm
The Guiding Principles envisage a vast panoply of judicial and non-judicial initiatives, of State-based and non-State based measures. [read post]
13 May 2020, 3:22 am
Written by Yannick Morath Yannick Morath, doctoral candidate at the University of Freiburg, has kindly provided us with his thoughts on the CJEU’s judgement in the case of LG and Others v Rina SpA, Ente Registro Italiano Navale (C-641/18 – ECLI:EU:C:2020:349) (See also the earlier post by Matthias Weller concerning the CJEU’s judgement). [read post]
10 May 2020, 3:38 pm
This arguably also applies to other avenues such as Art. 17 Rome II and the concept of ‘local data’. [read post]
22 Apr 2020, 9:02 pm
The first case of COVID-19 in Italy appeared in late January, when Chinese tourists from Wuhan were hospitalized in Rome after passing through Milan. [read post]
22 Mar 2020, 3:15 am
Alphabet https://t.co/DwhCwysLC2 2020-03-17 Another Troubling Courtroom Loss for Online Marketplaces–Massachusetts Port Authority v. [read post]
22 Mar 2020, 3:15 am
Alphabet https://t.co/DwhCwysLC2 2020-03-17 Another Troubling Courtroom Loss for Online Marketplaces–Massachusetts Port Authority v. [read post]
27 Feb 2020, 9:00 am
It can be argued that in the context of choice-of-law clauses made in relation to insurance contracts in general (and not solely large-risk insurances), the Rome I Regulation approaches the protection of the ‘weaker parties’ in a different manner than the Brussels I bis Regulation. [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 4:38 am
Trattamento Rifiuti Metropolitani (Lis Pendens and Conflicting Choice of Court Agreements in BNP Paribas v. [read post]
15 Feb 2020, 5:42 am
ItalyCasaPound v. [read post]
15 Jan 2020, 5:31 am
The U.N. secretary-general relied—as the depositary of the Rome Statute and according to existing practice (Chapter V)—on determinations made by the U.N. [read post]
13 Jan 2020, 3:00 am
The most powerful of the Pauline letters is the one he wrote to the new Christians living in Rome. [read post]
31 Dec 2019, 4:40 am
In Rimini Street, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Dec 2019, 7:55 am
” This overbroad formulation is a far cry from the definition set forth by the Supreme Court in Davis v. [read post]
16 Dec 2019, 10:17 am
The casenote analyses the decision, notably assessing the relationship of international jurisdiction and choice of law, the concept of “services” as contained in the Brussels I Regulation and the Rome I Regulation respectively, as well as the company law exception according to Art. 1 (2) (f) Rome I Regulation. [read post]
15 Dec 2019, 4:05 pm
United States The Gu [read post]
