Search for: "State v. Romero"
Results 201 - 220
of 260
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 May 2013, 1:25 pm
Supreme Court Rules Against Routine Warrantless Blood Tests in DUI Cases: The Supreme Court ruled in our favor in Missouri v. [read post]
30 Nov 2021, 6:29 pm
Our daily lives are currently impacted by ubiquitous decisions made by algorithms, as mathematical formulas and computer code establish instructions that shape the outcomes of markets, state, and society. [read post]
13 Nov 2017, 3:00 am
State v. [read post]
23 Mar 2014, 9:44 pm
ROBERT JEFFERSON v. [read post]
6 Nov 2024, 7:12 am
Democratic supporters had hoped to see Harris make history as the first Black woman elected president, while Republican voters sought the return of Trump, whose previous term saw significant conservative victories including the overturning of Roe v. [read post]
16 Mar 2009, 11:00 am
" State v. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 1:46 am
Shum v. [read post]
5 Mar 2007, 7:03 am
Romero (06-765). [read post]
7 Feb 2016, 2:15 am
People v. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 6:00 am
Romero, 27 S.W.3d 1, 6 (Tex. [read post]
Deportation Update: Biden Has Given Prosecutors More Power To Decide Which Immigration Cases To Drop
7 Jun 2021, 11:35 am
(Meza Morales 7th Cir, 2020; Romero v. [read post]
29 Aug 2022, 5:00 am
However, while young people in the foster care in most states can rely on state constitutional right to education to bolster their right to the COVID-19 vaccine,[15] youth in the juvenile justice system in certain states have less accessibility to a right to education. [read post]
2021 Virtual Annual Meeting of the Association for the Study of the Cuban Economy: Theme and Program
20 Jul 2021, 6:52 am
Romero, “Cuba and Venezuela Cooperation. [read post]
7 Feb 2022, 8:43 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
16 Jun 2015, 7:22 am
., United States v. [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 8:52 am
Romero-Barcelo). [read post]
5 Oct 2014, 11:47 am
Romero In Segovia v. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 7:58 am
(Colon v. [read post]
5 May 2010, 3:00 pm
Congressman Luis V. [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 2:15 pm
Mitchell, No. 02-3505 Denial of a petition for habeas relief in a death penalty case is reversed where: 1) a state court applied the Strickland standard in an objectively unreasonable manner for purposes of claims that petitioner's counsel were ineffective in preparing for the sentencing phase of his trial; 2) the state court unreasonably determined that the alleged errors of trial counsel did not prejudice petitioner's case; and 3) a state court erroneously… [read post]
