Search for: "State v. Romero"
Results 241 - 260
of 262
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 May 2008, 11:23 am
Here, Romero improperly conflated random match and source probability, an error that is especially profound given the weakness of the remaining evidence against Troy. [read post]
2 May 2008, 6:24 am
U.S. v. [read post]
29 Apr 2008, 7:13 am
Moore, No. 06-1082 In a case raising the issue of whether a police officer violates the Fourth Amendment by making an arrest based on probable cause but prohibited by state law, the Supreme Court rules that warrantless arrests for crimes committed in the presence of an arresting officer are reasonable under the Constitution, and that while states are free to regulate such arrests however they desire, state restrictions do not alter the Fourth Amendment's protections. … [read post]
4 Apr 2008, 9:35 pm
The ACLU chose to focus on Mohammed's defense, Romero said, because he appears to be ``the government's top priority in the prosecution. [read post]
4 Mar 2008, 12:14 pm
The United States thus became a model of justice for the world. [read post]
12 Feb 2008, 2:44 pm
Supreme Court in Romero v. [read post]
5 Feb 2008, 7:42 am
U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, January 31, 2008 Diaz-Romero v. [read post]
31 Jan 2008, 11:12 am
Diaz-Romero v. [read post]
29 Jan 2008, 10:35 am
State of Indiana (NFP) Felipe Romero v. [read post]
22 Jan 2008, 10:20 am
JURISDICTION/DUE PROCESSUnited States v. [read post]
22 Oct 2007, 2:26 pm
SENTENCINGUnited States v. [read post]
13 Sep 2007, 7:10 am
United States v. [read post]
8 Aug 2007, 5:20 am
State v. [read post]
5 Aug 2007, 3:35 pm
Stearns, 68 F.3d 328, 330 (9th Cir.1995); Romero v. [read post]
3 Jul 2007, 11:16 pm
Romero, 72 F.3d 518, 525 (7th Cir.1995). [read post]
2 Jul 2007, 8:27 am
SENTENCING/APPEALUnited States v. [read post]
2 Jul 2007, 6:05 am
Jimenez-Guiterrez (available here) and the Tenth Circuit discussed the obligation to state reasons in US v. [read post]
25 May 2007, 1:32 am
" State v. [read post]
18 May 2007, 9:37 am
" It stated that its decision in Romero dictated that "permanent exclusion" included the concept of visitation. [read post]
2 May 2007, 1:07 am
United States U.S. [read post]
