Search for: "State v. Romero" Results 81 - 100 of 289
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jun 2017, 12:50 pm by Dan Ernst
As many LHB readers are aware, the Law and Society Association hosts "Collaborative Research Networks" that sponsors panels for its annual meeting. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 10:18 pm
 During this time Corky and his wife, Geraldine Romero Gonzáles, raised a family of six daughters and two sons…. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 3:21 pm
 During this time Corky and his wife, Geraldine Romero Gonzáles, raised a family of six daughters and two sons…. [read post]
13 Mar 2017, 9:51 pm by Sme
Amerigas Propane, Inc. (10th Cir., March 10, 2017) (affirming summary judgment in favor of Amerigas:  Henson failed to show Amerigas’s stated reasons for firing him were pretexts for unlawfuldiscrimination and retaliation)ERISA and Employee Pension PlansSEC v. [read post]
9 Mar 2017, 6:37 am by Joy Waltemath
To the extent an employee’s tips are relevant in determining whether an employer has satisfied its minimum-wage obligations under Section 206(a), the threshold question is whether the employer can treat those tips as wages under Section 203(m) (Romero v. [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 6:26 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Weatherford, 694 F.3d 1160 (10th Cir. 2012) (ruling against individual Indians in trust accounting matter) Romero v. [read post]
24 Aug 2016, 6:01 am by Dean Freeman
Upon review, the state high court reversed an earlier holding – specifically that a policy with language similar to that in the Romero case, was ambiguous. [read post]
15 Jul 2016, 7:18 pm
Romero, Universidad Central de Venezuela, "Business as Usual: Venezuelan-Cuban Relations Today"Silvia Pedraza, University of Michigan, "The Impossible Triangle: Cuba, the US, and Miami and the Re-establishment of Relations"Jorge Hernandez Fonseca, Dr. [read post]
14 Jun 2016, 12:02 am
Menaker, The Consequences of Corruption in Investor-State Arbitration Alain Pellet, Police Powers or the State’s Right to Regulate Mark Feldman, Denial of Benefits after Plama v. [read post]