Search for: "State v. Rossi"
Results 61 - 80
of 128
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jun 2010, 3:57 am
Some Appellate Division decisions, on which the Appellate Division here relied, have applied strict privity to estate planning malpractice lawsuits commenced by the estate's personal representative and beneficiaries alike (Deeb v Johnson, 170 AD2d 865 [3d Dept 1991]; Spivey, 138 AD2d at 564; Viscardi v Lerner, 125 AD2d 662, 663-664 [2d Dept 1986]; Rossi v Boehner, 116 AD2d 636 [2d Dept 1986]). [read post]
4 Dec 2011, 5:54 am
See, e.g., Rossi v. [read post]
15 Sep 2015, 12:16 pm
” Sony Corp. of Am. v. [read post]
8 Mar 2013, 2:00 pm
Furthermore, the applicant had failed to include this claim in his application: the Court clarified that failure to state a claim in the application cannot be compensated by introducing the claim at the hearing (unless the plea is based on matters of law or of fact which come to light in the course of the procedure), as stated by Article 48(2) of the Rules of procedure of the General Court and held in previous case law (Case T‑246/06, Redcats SA v OHIM). [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 9:39 am
Summit Entertainment case: “17 USC 512(f) Claim Against 'Twilight' Studio Survives Motion to Dismiss” and Rossi v. [read post]
15 Dec 2021, 1:31 pm
In 2004, the Ninth Circuit eviscerated it (in the Rossi case) by requiring plaintiffs to show that senders subjectively believed their takedown notices were abusive. [read post]
11 Dec 2022, 9:56 am
The position of the EUIPO, when it comes to acquired distinctiveness through use in the UK for the purposes of an invalidation action against a registered EU trade mark (EUTM), is that the distinctiveness acquired through use in the UK is not relevant for EU trade mark applications filed after the end of the transition period (December 31st, 2020).However, the now said has not always been entirely clear, since case law (Decathlon v EUIPO (T‑349/19) EU:T:2020:488), states that… [read post]
12 Jun 2009, 3:06 pm
See, e.g., Rossi v. [read post]
19 Feb 2021, 3:37 am
Plaintiff was represented in the bankruptcy proceeding by Jules Rossi, Esq. [read post]
5 Oct 2023, 8:11 am
The US Supreme Court on Wednesday heard oral arguments in the case Acheson Hotels, LLC v. [read post]
5 Aug 2009, 2:07 pm
Rossi, Carmen V. [read post]
13 Aug 2008, 4:39 am
Along the way, Howard offers some good & useful criticisms of the cultural cognition project's work on Scott v. [read post]
27 Sep 2020, 7:08 am
The case at issue was an opposition to an application of a mark combining the sign “V” with words “Valentino Rudi” by the Italian high end fashion company Valentino. [read post]
4 Feb 2013, 11:52 am
Estate of Rossi, --- So.3d ---- 2013 WL 132449 (Fla. 5th DCA January 11, 2013) In Fla. [read post]
19 Jun 2008, 6:01 am
Under the holding of Rossi v. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 1:48 pm
In one 2004 case, Rossi v. [read post]
31 Jul 2015, 8:04 am
Under Rossi, this is an easy case. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 3:25 am
Some Appellate Division decisions, on which the Appellate Division here relied, have applied strict privity to estate planning malpractice lawsuits commenced by the estate's personal representative and beneficiaries alike (Deeb v Johnson, 170 AD2d 865 [3d Dept 1991]; Spivey, 138 AD2d at 564; Viscardi v Lerner, 125 AD2d 662, 663-664 [2d Dept 1986]; Rossi v Boehner, 116 AD2d 636 [2d Dept 1986]). [read post]
15 Sep 2015, 1:57 pm
Under Rossi v MPAA (2004), the Ninth Circuit has adopted the position that a copyright holder need only form a subjective good faith belief that the use was not authorized. [read post]
15 Sep 2015, 3:12 pm
In a ruling in the Lenz v. [read post]
