Search for: "State v. Rossi" Results 61 - 80 of 115
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jul 2012, 3:42 pm by Jeff Klein
In its decision, the New Jersey court quotes a prior New Jersey decision, Rossi v. [read post]
9 May 2012, 6:17 am by Rob Robinson
Avoiding Pitfalls When Moving eDiscovery to the Cloud – bit.ly/II2mMo (Philip Favro) Move Over Humans, 21st Century Document Review Has Arrived - bit.ly/IXZAlr (William Essig, Lawrence Del Rossi) N.D. [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 9:39 am by Venkat
Summit Entertainment case: “17 USC 512(f) Claim Against 'Twilight' Studio Survives Motion to Dismiss” and Rossi v. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 7:50 am by Carolyn E. Wright
 NJM  used the photo to illustrate an article in its “Best of New Jersey” issue naming Carton and Rossi “best shock jocks ” in the state. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 7:50 am by Carolyn E. Wright
 NJM  used the photo to illustrate an article in its “Best of New Jersey” issue naming Carton and Rossi “best shock jocks ” in the state. [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 4:44 am by Larry Ribstein
Yaniv Grinstein and and Stefano Rossi have an interesting paper, Good Monitoring, Bad Monitoring, on the effect of corporate law, and specifically of the famous Delaware case Smith v. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 4:20 am by Russ Bensing
Rossi, where the court held that the expungement provisions “must be liberally construed to promote their purposes,” or the 1988 decision in State v. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 3:25 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Some Appellate Division decisions, on which the Appellate Division here relied, have applied strict privity to estate planning malpractice lawsuits commenced by the estate's personal representative and beneficiaries alike (Deeb v Johnson, 170 AD2d 865 [3d Dept 1991]; Spivey, 138 AD2d at 564; Viscardi v Lerner, 125 AD2d 662, 663-664 [2d Dept 1986]; Rossi v Boehner, 116 AD2d 636 [2d Dept 1986]). [read post]
28 Sep 2010, 6:30 am by Lucas A. Ferrara, Esq.
She's also been courting tea party groups and has pledged to overturn Roe v. [read post]