Search for: "State v. Roth" Results 241 - 260 of 434
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 May 2014, 10:00 am by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Employersyand fiduciaries of 401(k) plans should take note of the potential need to adopt a mid-year amendment to their plans to comply with new guidance of the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) concerning the need to timely amend their plans to comply with IRS recent guidance on when their plans must afford same-sex partners treatment equivalent to opposite-sex married couples issued in response to the Supreme Court’s decision striking down the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) in United… [read post]
13 Mar 2014, 1:43 pm
The court stated in its judgment that DMG relied in particular on Jameel v Dow Jones & Co Inc [2005] EWCA Civ 75.In Jameel Lord Phillips MR stated [at 54]:“An abuse of process is of concern not merely to the parties but to the court. [read post]
20 Jan 2014, 2:23 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Sponsoring employers and administrators of cafeteria plans now have additional guidance from the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) about when same-sex couples can be treated as spouses for purposes of Internal Revenue Code (Code) Section 125’s rules on cafeteria plans, including health and dependent care flexible spending arrangements (FSAs), and Code Section 223’s rules about health savings accounts (HSAs) following the Supreme Court decision declaring unconstitutional the Defense of… [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 7:58 am by Alfred Brophy
 Justice Harris' viciously proslavery opinion in Mitchell v. [read post]
30 Oct 2013, 11:22 am by CrimProf BlogEditor
Roth (UC Berkeley School of Law) has posted Maryland v. [read post]
25 Oct 2013, 8:01 am by Ronald Collins
Mohr, Licensed to Practice: The Supreme Court Defines the American Medical Profession (Johns Hopkins University Press) Whitney Strub, Roth v. [read post]
27 Sep 2013, 12:39 pm by WIMS
Mukasey, 534 F.3d at 188 (quoting Council of Alternative Political Parties v. [read post]
29 Aug 2013, 10:04 am by Thomas Kaufman
  In so holding, the Ninth Circuit was simply recognizing that the United States Supreme Court’s decision earlier this year in Standard Fire Insurance v. [read post]