Search for: "State v. Roth"
Results 21 - 40
of 512
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Mar 2023, 6:30 am
United States, Rule 10b-5, SEC enforcement, Securities fraud, United States v. [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 6:30 am
United States, Rule 10b-5, SEC enforcement, Securities fraud, United States v. [read post]
21 Mar 2023, 6:30 am
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit issued another decision in United States v. [read post]
21 Mar 2023, 6:30 am
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit issued another decision in United States v. [read post]
13 Mar 2023, 9:08 am
, State v. [read post]
13 Mar 2023, 5:58 am
Brill, P.C., 25 AD3d 420, [1st Dept 2006]; Schulte Roth & Zabel, LLP v Kassover, 80 AD3d 500,501 [1st Dept 2011]). [read post]
9 Mar 2023, 6:53 am
Rotheli v. [read post]
6 Mar 2023, 1:56 pm
[xv] See Footnote v. [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 4:47 am
As per the guidance in R v Secretary of State, chambers should identify one named clerk responsible for communicating the draft judgment from the court to the relevant barristers. [read post]
9 Feb 2023, 4:44 am
United States. [read post]
29 Jan 2023, 4:31 am
IndiaState v. [read post]
19 Dec 2022, 4:00 am
By Eric SegallThis was a no good, terrible, very bad year at the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
[Eugene Volokh] Third Circuit Reaffirms that Even Nonviolent Felons May Lose Second Amendment Rights
16 Nov 2022, 11:49 am
The case is Range v. [read post]
7 Nov 2022, 3:34 am
Court Upholds Amendment of Limited Partnership Agreement’s Dissolution Date In Steven Mizel Roth IRA v Unified Capital Partners 3 LLC, District Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald describes the subject Delaware limited partnership as “an entity that was formed to pool investments into a fund (the “Fund”) for litigation-related financing ventures. [read post]
26 Oct 2022, 6:38 am
However, the precise definition of obscenity was unclear, and the Supreme Court would not rule that obscenity was not constitutionally protected speech until Roth v. [read post]
23 Sep 2022, 2:26 pm
Otto Roth & Co. v. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 1:00 am
"The Attorney General explained that "... courts have held that a public employee threatened with dismissal is entitled to due process protections if he has acquired a liberty or property interest in his employment; that is, a legitimate entitlement to continued employment," citing Economico v Village of Pelham, 50 NY2d 120, Elrod v Burns, 427 US 347, and Board of Regents v Roth, 408 US 564. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 1:00 am
"The Attorney General explained that "... courts have held that a public employee threatened with dismissal is entitled to due process protections if he has acquired a liberty or property interest in his employment; that is, a legitimate entitlement to continued employment," citing Economico v Village of Pelham, 50 NY2d 120, Elrod v Burns, 427 US 347, and Board of Regents v Roth, 408 US 564. [read post]
25 Aug 2022, 4:54 pm
State Rifle & Pistol Ass'n, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Aug 2022, 9:35 am
Roth v District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment, 2022 WL 3269777 (DC App. 8/11/2022) [read post]
