Search for: "State v. Rothenberger" Results 1 - 20 of 60
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Oct 2014, 7:04 pm
State, and Judge Rothenberg and company reach the conclusion that it is a discovery violation most foul when the State lists a "victim" (which every good defense attorney knows should be called "complaining witness") as category B witness. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 9:00 am by azatty
Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day O’Connor (ret.), and Arizona Supreme Court Chief Justice Ruth V. [read post]
2 Sep 2010, 6:43 am by Mala Mason
The Court of Appeals for one district in Ohio recently approved such a sale in Park National Bank v. [read post]
2 Feb 2022, 5:14 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Bank National Association v Moss, 186 AD3d 1753, 1753 [2d Dept 2020]; State v Winkle, 179 AD3d 1121, 1126 [2d Dept 2020]). [read post]
26 Apr 2013, 3:36 am by Rumpole
That's the first mistake that has Judge Rothenberg upset. [read post]
1 Jul 2020, 5:16 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Rothenberg hits both issues when a $14 Million estate consisting of Brooklyn and Hong Kong properties devolves into a family fight over the proceeds. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 6:51 am by Dan Bushell
The majority relied in part on Kingsway Amigo and the primary case that decision relied on, State Farm Insurance Co. v. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 8:13 am by South Florida Lawyers
You would think the answer to that question would be settled law, but remember this is Florida state court we are talking about.Here is what Judge Rothenberg has to say:We agree with the First, Second, Fourth, and Fifth Districts. [read post]