Search for: "State v. Rothenberger"
Results 1 - 20
of 67
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Apr 2024, 3:00 am
The law is very clear that an agreement to perform unaudited services does not shield an accountant from liability because an accountant must perform all services in accordance with the standard of a reasonable accountant under similar circumstances, which includes reporting fraud that is or should be apparent (see 1136 Tenants’ Corp. v Rothenberg & Co., 36 AD2d 804 [1st Dept 1971], affd 30 NY2d 585 [1972]; see also William Iselin & Co., Inc. v Mann… [read post]
10 Mar 2023, 5:32 pm
But see Rothenberg v. [read post]
2 Feb 2022, 5:14 am
Bank National Association v Moss, 186 AD3d 1753, 1753 [2d Dept 2020]; State v Winkle, 179 AD3d 1121, 1126 [2d Dept 2020]). [read post]
1 Jul 2020, 5:16 am
Rothenberg hits both issues when a $14 Million estate consisting of Brooklyn and Hong Kong properties devolves into a family fight over the proceeds. [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 10:47 am
Supreme Court’s decision in Financial Oversight and Management Bd. v. [read post]
29 Apr 2019, 9:53 pm
The Lobree v. [read post]
5 Oct 2018, 2:53 pm
Today, Governor Rick Scott announced the appointment of three new County Court judges to replace Judges Dawn V. [read post]
7 Mar 2017, 12:30 am
State. [read post]
15 Nov 2016, 12:32 pm
Rothenberg.) [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 10:44 am
If you have been following the machinations by the Obama Justice Department [sic] over amending the ASCAP and BMI consent decrees, you may have found yourself wondering who was responsible for rejecting the good faith efforts of the songwriting community in favor of a cynical back room deal with multinational tech companies and broadcasters. [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 6:57 am
Cohen v. [read post]
6 Apr 2016, 12:06 pm
One of the Legislature’s stated purposes in amending Section 90.702 was “to adopt the standards for expert testimony in the courts of this state as provided in Daubert v. [read post]
26 Aug 2015, 6:33 am
Erhard Milch), and NMT 4 (U.S.A. v. [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 7:04 pm
State, and Judge Rothenberg and company reach the conclusion that it is a discovery violation most foul when the State lists a "victim" (which every good defense attorney knows should be called "complaining witness") as category B witness. [read post]
13 Mar 2014, 9:17 pm
Appellate Attorneys Richard Klugh, Jr and John Bergendahl argued two issues before the three Judge panel of Rothenberg, Emas, and Logue. [read post]
29 Aug 2013, 8:30 am
Rothenberg, Esq. [read post]
23 Jul 2013, 8:43 am
” Id. at 6 (citing Billups -Rothenberg, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Jun 2013, 2:04 pm
Brugmann v. [read post]
26 Apr 2013, 3:36 am
That's the first mistake that has Judge Rothenberg upset. [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 12:39 pm
Sherman v. [read post]
