Search for: "State v. Royal" Results 201 - 220 of 2,229
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jun 2017, 8:00 am by Dan Ernst
A v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2005]: The Belmarsh CaseRichard Clayton9. [read post]
29 Mar 2016, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
Last month PR guru Max Clifford was ordered to pay the former Royal Butler Paul Burrell £5,000 compensation for the unauthorised disclosure of private information contained within a letter Mr Burrell had sent him. [read post]
Royal Dutch Shell, manages to raise an even broader question: Are there any substantive limits to the federal government’s power to regulate matters occurring outside and having nothing do with the United States? [read post]
18 Sep 2010, 9:49 am by Marta Requejo
“I’ve now had a chance to read a little more closely the decision, majority and concurrence, in Kiobel v. [read post]
16 Apr 2008, 1:27 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Regus (UK) Ltd v Epcot Solutions Ltd [2008] EWCA Civ 361 (15 April 2008) London Borough of Wandsworth v Allison [2008] EWCA Civ 354 (15 April 2008) YB (Eritrea) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2008] EWCA Civ 360 (15 April 2008) High Court (Family Division) Nottingham City Council v G & Ors [2008] EWHC 540 (Fam) (18 March 2008) High Court (Administrative Court) Office of Government Commerce v… [read post]
26 Mar 2014, 6:10 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The Court of Appeals says the individuals do not have qualified immunity from First Amendment liability, which means the case can forge ahead.The case is Royal Crown Day Care, LLC v. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 10:09 pm by Marta Requejo
Supreme Court and the Future of Human Rights Keitner on Human Rights Enforcement through Transnational Litigation New Alien Tort Statute Case At The United States Supreme Court: Kiobel, et al., v Royal Dutch Petroleum Petition Filed [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 1:00 am by INFORRM
The case of Banks v Cadwalladr concluded before Steyn J in the Royal Courts of Justice this week, with Cadwalladr arguing that her belief that the “covert relationship” between Banks and the Russian government was reasonable; the defence of public interest applies. [read post]
3 Jun 2013, 7:12 am by David Oscar Markus
But I doubt that the proud men who wrote the charter of ourliberties would have been so eager to open their mouths for royal inspection. [read post]