Search for: "State v. Royal" Results 201 - 220 of 1,701
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Oct 2011, 4:48 am
Royal Dutch Shell Petroleum (2d Cir. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 7:47 am by scardenas
In gearing up for Kiobel v. [read post]
12 Oct 2009, 6:16 am
Royale with or without cheese anyone (metaphorically, of course)? [read post]
22 Sep 2014, 9:00 am by Emily Dorotheou, Olswang LLP
Both Houses considered the case of Sidaway v Board of Governors for Bethlem Royal Hospital and Others [1985] 1 AC which held that the Bolam test would determine whether an omission to warn a patient of inherent risks of a proposed treatment constituted a breach of the doctor’s duty of care. [read post]
5 Nov 2017, 2:15 pm
Cases on either side of the line include Royal Trust Co. v. [read post]
17 Dec 2011, 8:42 am by Dave
Three decisions of the Administrative Appeals Chamber of the Upper Tribunal on HB matters stand out: SS v North East Lincolnshire Council (HB) [2011] UKUT 300 (AAC); MB v Royal Borough of Kensington & Chelsea (HB) [2011] UKUT 321 (AAC); MR v Bournemouth Borough Council (HB) [2011] UKUT 284 (AAC).  [read post]
17 Dec 2011, 8:42 am by Dave
Three decisions of the Administrative Appeals Chamber of the Upper Tribunal on HB matters stand out: SS v North East Lincolnshire Council (HB) [2011] UKUT 300 (AAC); MB v Royal Borough of Kensington & Chelsea (HB) [2011] UKUT 321 (AAC); MR v Bournemouth Borough Council (HB) [2011] UKUT 284 (AAC).  [read post]
8 Nov 2013, 10:20 am by Laura Sandwell
In Bracking & Ors v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2013] EWCA Civ 1345 the Court of Appeal upheld a challenge to the Government’s decision to abolish the Independent Living Fund for disabled people. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 2:11 am by Blog Editorial
He says that the Government’s attempt to effect these changes using the royal prerogative offends the imperative rule of our constitution. 15.18 The Lord Advocate for the Scottish Government, the Rt Hon W. [read post]