Search for: "State v. Royal"
Results 21 - 40
of 1,945
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Dec 2024, 1:25 am
United States On 2 December 2024, judgment was handed down dismissing the appeal in State of Washington v Meta Platforms, Inc., — P.3d —, 2024 WL 4929812 (Wash. [read post]
4 Dec 2024, 4:03 pm
From U.S. v. [read post]
24 Nov 2024, 4:45 am
” Friday prayers and maximum-security prisons Ali v Secretary of State for Justice [2024] EWHC 2829 (KB) was an appeal against the dismissal of Mr Ali’s claim in the County Court in Central London. [read post]
23 Nov 2024, 11:22 am
State v. [read post]
22 Nov 2024, 4:51 am
This point was spelled out by Justice Joseph Story in his Commentaries on the Constitution of the United States. [read post]
20 Nov 2024, 6:12 am
Royal Dutch Petroleum Co. [read post]
19 Nov 2024, 8:33 am
The Sixth Circuit case (Oklahoma v. [read post]
18 Nov 2024, 1:29 am
The Judge ruled that there was “sufficient justification” for a limited number of emails sent between NGN employees and employees of the Royal Household to be disclosed, despite objections by the defendant that they were not relevant to the pleaded issues. [read post]
9 Nov 2024, 12:32 pm
From Judge Terrence Berg's opinion on Election Day in ACLU of Mich. v. [read post]
7 Nov 2024, 7:52 am
They preserve the revolution precisely by transposing the revolutionary performance from outside the constitutional state (and thus a threat to it) to become a method, a performance of the revolutionary trajectories now in the service of constitutional stability, or at least solidity. [read post]
5 Nov 2024, 11:23 am
And the Jacobin conundrum--hierarchy, leadership, and control within idealized perceptions of equality remain at the center, the justification for which remains a central element of democracies whether in the form of "brain trust" techno-bureaucratic democracy, traditional populism (irrespective of its ideological tilts), or any of the forms of vanguardism--either progressive (that is progressing toward some eventual ideal state) or otherwise--remains at the core… [read post]
4 Nov 2024, 6:11 am
Supreme Court held oral argument in Royal Canin U.S.A., Inc. v. [read post]
28 Oct 2024, 8:55 am
Here is the abstract: This article previews the appeal in Royal Canin U.S.A., Inc and Nestlé Purina PetCare Co. v. [read post]
18 Oct 2024, 11:49 am
In particular, the EDPB states that a private entity can rely on legitimate interests to “report to law enforcement authorities possible criminal acts or threats it may occasionally become aware of. [read post]
15 Oct 2024, 12:10 pm
(See, e.g., Oren Royal Oaks Venture v. [read post]
14 Oct 2024, 6:00 am
Below is a brief summary of the other cases before the Court: Royal Canin U.S.A., Inc. v. [read post]
14 Oct 2024, 2:50 am
Former footballer, Joey Barton has made a statement in open court, in which he apologised for suggesting that Radio 2 presenter Jeremy Vine had a sexual interest in children in a series of online posts and stated that he recognised the allegations were untrue. [read post]
13 Oct 2024, 1:03 pm
Enfield have not fallen foul of the principles enunciated by Lord Dyson in R(Lumba) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (2012) 1 AC 245. [read post]
7 Oct 2024, 5:00 am
The main case on this point is the House of Lords decision in Street v. [read post]
2 Oct 2024, 6:26 am
In effect, it is a descriptive survey comprised of five sections: (i) the operation of the Act; (ii) current issues in defamation law; (iii) stakeholder opinions; (iv) developments in NI and elsewhere; and (v) conclusions and recommendations. [read post]