Search for: "State v. Royal" Results 21 - 40 of 1,850
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Sep 2019, 3:27 am by tracey
Supreme Court Miller, R (on the application of) v The Prime Minister [2019] UKSC 41 (24 September 2019) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) S-L (Children : Adjournment) [2019] EWCA Civ 1571 (19 September 2019) Langton, R (On the Application Of) v Secretary of State for Environment, Food And Rural Affairs & Anor [2019] EWCA Civ 1562 (17 September 2019) The Good Law Project, R (On the Application Of) v The Electoral Commission [2019] EWCA Civ 1567 (17 September… [read post]
16 Sep 2019, 6:00 am by Thomas Hayes
Tafida Raqeeb has been in hospital at the Royal London for five months after suffering a catastrophic intracranial bleed. [read post]
15 Sep 2019, 7:10 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
Prior to the licensing of paralegals in Ontario, the Ontario Court of Appeal reviewed the issue of agents in R. v. [read post]
11 Sep 2019, 6:20 am by Jo Moore
Political questions, and certain matters involving the exercise of the Royal Prerogative, are often argued (and held) to be beyond the reach of judicial review. [read post]
10 Sep 2019, 4:23 am by Sam Sykes
‘broadly speaking the maintenance of order and the prevention and detection of crime’ (R(Catt) v Association of Chief Police Officers per Lord Sumption). [read post]
8 Sep 2019, 8:17 pm
  Protecito0n form unlawful interference states the obvious--and it adds little to the duty of states to force them to declare that they will do what they are constitutionally burdened with doing. [read post]
8 Sep 2019, 9:43 am by Omar Ha-Redeye
A small handful of cases involving judicial review have ensured the CICB continued to achieve the goals stated in the Act in a reasonable manner. [read post]
5 Sep 2019, 12:49 am by CMS
Aidan O’Neill QC argues that following the case of Andy Wightman MSP and others v Secretary of State for Exiting the EU it is clear that the Article 50 notification can be withdrawn at any time. [read post]
3 Sep 2019, 2:01 pm by Jon Sands
The 9th concludes that a prior Minnesota state conviction for aiding and abetting a simple robbery is a “violent felony” under Stokeling v. [read post]
3 Sep 2019, 10:29 am by Patricia Hughes
This approach is more in keeping with the presidential system in, for example, the United States, and not consistent with the Westminster form of government, in which an election can occur at any time, with the approval of the Governor General. [read post]
3 Sep 2019, 12:41 am by CMS
He refers to R (on the application of Miller and another) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union [2017] UKSC 5, noting it is consistent with the UK Government position. 1449: David Johnston QC refers to the Fixed Term Parliaments Act 2011 in accordance with which dissolution must take place. [read post]
2 Sep 2019, 7:56 am by Conor Monighan
Automated Facial Recognition and Human Rights: The Royal Society, 10th September, with The Human Rights, Big Data and Technology Project. [read post]
27 Aug 2019, 4:00 pm by The Law Office of John Guidry II
  The state’s standing argument didn’t fly, in light of the recent US Supreme Court case of Byrd v. [read post]
19 Aug 2019, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
In the UK, the Queen might well adhere to the longstanding norm of royal political neutrality, even as Johnson was flouting other longstanding democratic norms.I agree with the observation that democracy everywhere depends on norms and some measure of good faith. [read post]
18 Aug 2019, 8:18 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
It was also submitted for judicial review to the Federal Court in Chrétien v. [read post]