Search for: "State v. Royal"
Results 61 - 80
of 1,845
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jun 2019, 7:57 am
In advance of tomorrow’s eagerly awaited Supreme Court “serious harm” decision in Lachaux v Independent Print, the latest Judicial Statistics show, for the second year running, a substantial increase in the number of issued defamation claims. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 1:00 am
Paten v Secretary of State for the Home Department; Secretary of State for the Home Department v Shah, heard 7 May 2019. [read post]
4 Jun 2019, 6:00 am
“Best Interests of the Corporation” – more than solely shareholder interests Bill C-97 aims to consolidate the law on the fiduciary duty of directors and officers by codifying the Supreme Court’s findings in BCE Inc. v. 1976 Debentureholders (BCE). [read post]
23 May 2019, 6:34 am
The onus has shifted to the state to justify an interference with a right. [read post]
21 May 2019, 3:53 am
Saskia also acted for a number of insurers in responding to, and appearing before, the Australian Royal Commission into Misconduct in the Banking, Superannuation and Financial Services Industry. [read post]
19 May 2019, 4:08 pm
These amendments received Royal Assent through Bill C-14 on June 17, 2016, through what is now called Medical Assistance in Dying (MAiD). [read post]
16 May 2019, 3:09 am
Supreme Court Privacy International, R (on the application of)v Investigatory Powers Tribunal & Ors [2019] UKSC 22 (15 May 2019) DA & Ors, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2019] UKSC 21 (15 May 2019) Telereal Trillium v Hewitt (Valuation Officer) [2019] UKSC 23 (15 May 2019) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Anderson v Turning Point Eespro [2019] EWCA Civ 815 (15 May 2019) Merinson v Yukos… [read post]
14 May 2019, 9:01 pm
The 4-1 ruling in Chisolm v. [read post]
10 May 2019, 1:19 pm
(citing United States v. [read post]
10 May 2019, 9:48 am
Royal Court of Justice, United Kingdom (1989)). [read post]
7 May 2019, 1:00 am
Former Secretary of State for Defence Gavin Williamson. [read post]
3 May 2019, 3:05 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) TM (Kenya), R (On the Application Of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2019] EWCA Civ 784 (03 May 2019) The State of the Netherlands v Deutsche Bank AG [2019] EWCA Civ 771 (02 May 2019) High Court (Chancery Division) Media-Saturn Holding GmbH & Ors v Toshiba Information Systems (UK) Ltd & Ors [2019] EWHC 1095 (Ch) (02 May 2019) Rose & Ors v Creativityetc Ltd & Ors [2019] EWHC 1043 (Ch)… [read post]
1 May 2019, 7:51 am
Supreme Court on the basis that US courts lacked jurisdiction in that case (case opinion here: Kiobel v. [read post]
30 Apr 2019, 11:45 am
If you are not familiar with Open Access, please visit my other blog for an introduction.Green Open Access [info]"The Ambiguous Authority of a ‘Surrogate State’: UNHCR’s Negotiation of Asylum in the Complexities of Migration in Southeast Asia," Revue Européenne des Migrations Internationales (Forthcoming, 2019) - The postprint version of this article is currently under embargo. [read post]
28 Apr 2019, 11:22 am
Evans v Fleri (2019) EW Misc 12 (CC) A lesson in drafting from Wales. [read post]
24 Apr 2019, 8:00 am
However, the California Supreme Court stated years ago in Morillion v Royal Packing Co. (2000) 22 C4th 575 that employees who are subject to the employer’s control while traveling to a worksite on a company-provided bus are entitled to compensation for the travel time. [read post]
24 Apr 2019, 8:00 am
However, the California Supreme Court stated years ago in Morillion v Royal Packing Co. (2000) 22 C4th 575 that employees who are subject to the employer’s control while traveling to a worksite on a company-provided bus are entitled to compensation for the travel time. [read post]
24 Apr 2019, 3:28 am
Practical implications of the Supreme Court decision The ruling of the Supreme Court in Vedanta has been already called the“the most important judicial decision in the field of business and human rights since the jurisdictional ruling of the United States Supreme Court in Kiobel v Royal Dutch Petroleum in 2013”. [read post]
23 Apr 2019, 11:34 am
In the United States, challenges to this exemption under the Fourth Amendment failed, with the Supreme Court holding in United States v White that consent surveillance does not intrude upon a reasonable expectation of privacy. [read post]
22 Apr 2019, 3:06 am
Goldscheider v Royal Opera House Covent Garden Foundation: The Court of Appeal rejected a challenge to the High Court’s decision to make the Royal Opera House liable for acoustic shock suffered by the claimant. [read post]
