Search for: "State v. Royal" Results 61 - 80 of 1,671
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 May 2020, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
He reaffirmed the Court of Appeal’s finding in Campbell v MGN Ltd [2002] EWCA Civ 1373 that the defendant’s state of mind is irrelevant to the tort of misuse of private information. [read post]
11 May 2020, 5:11 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
R (on the application of Pathan) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 12 December 2019. [read post]
5 May 2020, 6:42 am by Nathan Dorn
Its work included developing a state constitution, composing a bill of rights, and drafting a missive to the royal governor of South Carolina laying out the colonists’ grievances against the King. [read post]
Civil proceedings have, since 1995, advocated this exclusively  objective test (Royal Brunei Airlines Sdn Bhd v Tan [1995] 2 AC 164, confirmed by Barlow Clowes International Ltd v Eurotrust International Ltd [2005] UKPC 37). [read post]
4 May 2020, 2:07 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
R (on the application of Pathan) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 12 December 2019. [read post]
1 May 2020, 2:11 am by Shannon O'Hare
In addition to the tax and social measures taken to limit the economic and social disturbances deriving from the outbreak, the European Commission has authorised the French Government to guarantee, using state investment bank Bpifrance Financement S.A., up to EUR 300 bn of  loans granted to companies facing cash shortages as a result of this crisis. [read post]
27 Apr 2020, 2:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
R (on the application of Pathan) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 12 December 2019. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 2:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
R (on the application of Pathan) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 12 December 2019. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 1:46 am by Nedim Malovic
The reputation must also be prior to the filing of the contested trade mark; it must exist in the territory concerned and for the goods and/or services on which the opposition is based, andRisk of injury: registration of the contested trade mark would take unfair advantage of, or be detrimental to, the distinctive character or repute of the earlier trade markCase law (T-345/08, Rubinstein and L'Oréal v OHMI) has clarified that the requirements above are cumulative.Reputation of… [read post]
17 Apr 2020, 9:05 pm by Jamison Chung
  In Shelby County v. [read post]
30 Mar 2020, 5:46 pm
Boredom: The Literary History of a State of Mind. [read post]
27 Mar 2020, 7:37 pm by Robert Thomas (inversecondemnation.com)
We've written about this issue recently here: Latest Readings: On Emergency Takings, Compensation For Commandeered Property The Royal Origins Of "Police Power" Hawaii-Style: The King v. [read post]
26 Mar 2020, 6:48 pm by Robert Thomas (inversecondemnation.com)
  Here are our own prior posts on the topic: The Royal Origins Of "Police Power" Hawaii-Style: The King v. [read post]
23 Mar 2020, 2:30 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
AM (Zimbabwe) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 4-5 December 2019. [read post]