Search for: "State v. Royal"
Results 141 - 160
of 2,211
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Nov 2014, 2:31 am
On appeal from: [2014] EWCA Civ 1106 The claimant was a member of the Saudi Arabian Royal Family and had failed to comply with an order that he personally sign a witness statement pertaining to disclosure matters in relation to his joint venture with the respondent for setting up a 3rd company. [read post]
14 Jul 2015, 9:03 am
In Tarasewicz v. [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 2:30 am
” 14.24: James Eadie QC notes that the royal prerogative is a freestanding source of power. [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 7:45 am
Supreme Court Holland v Revenue and Customs & Anor [2010] UKSC 51 (24 November 2010) MA (Somalia) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2010] UKSC 49 (24 November 2010) Royal Bank of Scotland plc v Wilson & Anor (Scotland) [2010] UKSC 50 (24 November 2010) Source: www.bailii.org [read post]
9 Oct 2012, 7:04 am
Royal Capital Development LLC v. [read post]
7 Sep 2013, 7:55 am
The ‘we’ here is not a royal one, but a social one. [read post]
26 May 2017, 5:41 pm
The fisherman was safely rescued by a nearby good Samaritan, the fishing vessel Crown Royal. [read post]
1 Nov 2006, 5:28 am
BNA's United States Law Week reported in Vol. 75, No. 15 (Oct. 24, 2006) on the case Royal and Sun Alliance Insurance Co. of Canada v. [read post]
5 Feb 2012, 11:55 am
Department of State, has the following analysis of the International Court of Justice’s decision Friday in Jurisdictional Immunities of the State (Germany v. [read post]
12 Apr 2012, 5:49 am
In British Waterways v Royal & Sun Alliance Insurance Plc [2012] EWHC 460 (Comm), the High Court held that sums paid by the claimant, British Waterways, in relation to liability for the death of two farmers when a tractor fell into a canal was covered by the policy issued by the defendant, Royal & Sun Alliance Insurance Plc, and that the sums were not excluded as liability "arising out of" the operation of the tractor as a tool.The claimant pleaded guilty… [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 5:15 am
In two recent decisions, the United States Courts of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit and the Seventh Circuit each split with the Second Circuit’s 2010 decision in Kiobel v. [read post]
18 Aug 2010, 9:59 am
See United States v. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 6:55 am
Royal Dutch Petroleum Co., the decision in Kurns v. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 1:55 pm
Royal Dutch Petroleum posed two intertwined questions. [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 10:04 am
Royal Dutch Petroleum symposium is written by Sarah H. [read post]
26 May 2023, 1:00 pm
In Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea v Bafna-Louis, 2023 WL 2387385 (S.D.N.Y., 2023) the Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea (the “RBKC”) brought a petition for the return of CBL and Baby L to the United Kingdom pursuant to the Hague Convention. [read post]
1 Oct 2007, 11:19 am
., Intervenors-Plaintiffs, versus M/V OCEAN JEWELL OF ST. [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 9:54 am
I decided to write about this case, Royal v. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 2:52 pm
Thirdly, the earlier trade mark must have a reputation in the European Union, in the case of an earlier CTM, or in the Member State concerned, in the case of an earlier national trade mark. [read post]
20 May 2013, 3:18 pm
Royal Dutch Petroleum, and the International Court of Justice in Germany v. [read post]
