Search for: "State v. Rupe"
Results 1 - 20
of 51
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Dec 2023, 4:39 am
For something less than a rupee a day a man can feed himself sumptuously in San Francisco, even though he be a bankrupt. [read post]
1 Jul 2023, 3:02 am
The Indian High Court of Karnataka dismissed Twitter’s petition against the Central government’s blocking orders on Friday and imposed a ₹5 million rupees fine on the microblogging platform. [read post]
17 Aug 2022, 11:18 am
In the case of The State v. [read post]
8 Nov 2021, 9:59 am
"] From Russe v. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 1:37 am
Article 23 of the draft NIS Directive states that “Member States shall ensure that the TLD registries and the entities providing domain name registration services for the TLD publish, without undue delay after the registration of a domain name, domain registration data which are not personal data. [read post]
12 Aug 2021, 8:43 am
The statement was made by Minister of State for Defense Ajay Bhatt in response to a question raised by Kerala MP V. [read post]
31 Jan 2021, 4:13 pm
(Brad) Blair v. [read post]
8 Jan 2021, 12:11 pm
Chief Justice of India SA Bobde and Justices V Ramasubramanian and AS Bopanna were on the bench Wednesday hearing the petition. [read post]
1 Jun 2020, 5:07 pm
It could potentially run to crores of rupees. [read post]
25 Jul 2019, 11:00 am
EDITOR’S NOTE: The symbol “₹” is the sign for Indian Rupees. [read post]
28 Dec 2018, 6:29 am
") Brief Thoughts on Jesner v. [read post]
22 May 2018, 11:13 pm
D&O Diary post on Palkon v. [read post]
4 Sep 2017, 12:56 am
State of Uttar Pradesh ([1964] 1 SCR 332). [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 10:33 am
The Ordinance was challenged by a person acting as an accountant for a temple trust before the Allahabad High Court in B Ram Lal v. [read post]
17 Oct 2016, 4:04 pm
State v. [read post]
28 Mar 2016, 4:50 pm
The court stated that the object of enactment of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 was to make the anti-corruption law more effective and widen its coverage. [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 7:34 am
RUEDA, Appellant V. [read post]
24 Jan 2016, 8:47 am
Civil matters are subject to the qualification of the dispute being related to property, debt, damage or demand not exceeding rupees 250,000.[13] Further it is subject to number of exceptions such as fundamental rights and matrimonial disputes. [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 6:59 am
The term of imprisonment for contravening the ban was also raised from six months to five years, and the possible fine raised from 1,000 rupees to 10,000 rupees (about US$152). [read post]
2 Jul 2015, 9:53 am
Tahra Begum v. [read post]
