Search for: "State v. Rupe"
Results 41 - 58
of 58
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Jan 2012, 5:47 am
In the previous post, we had provided a descriptive comment of the decision of the Supreme Court in MP Rural Road Development Authority v. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 1:37 am
Article 23 of the draft NIS Directive states that “Member States shall ensure that the TLD registries and the entities providing domain name registration services for the TLD publish, without undue delay after the registration of a domain name, domain registration data which are not personal data. [read post]
21 May 2012, 3:54 am
,Suchomajcz v Hummel Chem. [read post]
14 Jul 2012, 12:55 pm
Bhaskaran v. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 12:47 pm
Ltd. v. [read post]
6 Dec 2019, 1:03 pm
Thus, the famous case of Perry v. [read post]
20 Feb 2011, 9:44 pm
‘obviousness-type’ double patenting practise (America-Israel Patent Law) Injunction by ORT Israel against World ORT using name in Israel overturned (The IP Factor) United Kingdom An epic tale of… erm, patents and trademarks – EWHC (Pat) decides Datacard v Eagle (IPKat) (EPLAW) EWHC (Ch): Play-Doah ruling goes Hasbro’s way: Hasbro v Nahrmittel (Class 46) (IPKat) Hargreaves and the SME litigants (Solo Independent IP Practitioners) The patent… [read post]
28 Mar 2016, 4:50 pm
The court stated that the object of enactment of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 was to make the anti-corruption law more effective and widen its coverage. [read post]
29 Dec 2014, 4:14 am
Like me, Randazza — who was my counsel in Rakofsky v. [read post]
18 Mar 2012, 9:34 pm
Ahmad v. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 12:40 pm
Sections 35 and 35A have been considered recently by this Court in Salem Advocates Bar Association v. [read post]
25 Jul 2019, 11:00 am
EDITOR’S NOTE: The symbol “₹” is the sign for Indian Rupees. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 6:45 am
“This is something that could be powerful,” said Abhijit V. [read post]
22 Oct 2011, 6:25 am
http://j.st/pb6 Palmer v. [read post]
17 Aug 2022, 11:18 am
In the case of The State v. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 8:45 am
It has also proposed that a fine of a maximum of rupees ten lakhs may be imposed, which shall be given to the victim. [read post]
1 Oct 2012, 11:54 pm
Four cheques for a total sum of rupees ten lakhs were issued by the respondent-company on 14th August, 1996 in favour of the appellant which were presented to the bank for collection on 21st November, 1996. [read post]
24 Jan 2016, 8:47 am
Civil matters are subject to the qualification of the dispute being related to property, debt, damage or demand not exceeding rupees 250,000.[13] Further it is subject to number of exceptions such as fundamental rights and matrimonial disputes. [read post]
