Search for: "State v. Rush"
Results 1 - 20
of 1,738
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Mar 2025, 6:30 am
After all, the core idea underlying the modern First Amendment is that the government may not as Justice Jackson put it in West Virginia v. [read post]
17 Mar 2025, 9:01 pm
”[5] The Act does not provide a minimum period to receive comments on rule proposals.[6]But, a comment period of at least 60 days has been endorsed by the Administrative Conference of the United States for significant regulatory actions.[7] Further, executive orders issued by multiple past presidents from both political parties have all recognized the importance of a minimum 60-day comment period.[8] During the past four years, a significant number of proposals had comment periods… [read post]
17 Mar 2025, 3:06 pm
Instead, the evidence showed that the defendant was driving approximately 25 to 30 mph—well below the speed limit on the interstate highway, in stop-and-go traffic at rush hour, and that he applied his brakes before colliding with the plaintiff, who’d stopped ahead of him. [read post]
17 Mar 2025, 1:58 pm
” Judge Rushing’s concurrence advanced four principal points. [read post]
15 Mar 2025, 12:00 pm
Rushing stated the government made “a strong showing” that it is likely to succeed in demonstrating that the orders in question banning the DEI programs do not violate the First or Fifth Amendments, thereby satisfying the standard for a stay under Nken v. [read post]
13 Mar 2025, 4:00 am
What Roe v Wade Should Have Said is a valuable text for those who want to learn more about the abortion debate in the United States. [read post]
12 Mar 2025, 9:01 pm
When President Donald Trump signed the Prioritizing Military Excellence Order, questions arose as to whether it would be a complete transgender service ban or a variation of the Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell regime. [read post]
11 Mar 2025, 4:41 pm
ARI Comment in IPO Consultation v F 2Download [read post]
4 Mar 2025, 5:54 pm
ARI Comment in IPO Consultation v F 2Download [read post]
28 Feb 2025, 9:10 am
Beck won a case titled United States v. [read post]
24 Feb 2025, 4:41 am
Reilly, Frank Thorp V, and Dareh Gregorian report for NBC News. [read post]
21 Feb 2025, 10:02 am
Biden (later Murthy v. [read post]
18 Feb 2025, 3:17 pm
Clapper v. [read post]
14 Feb 2025, 3:34 pm
United States and Percoco v. [read post]
13 Feb 2025, 11:26 pm
Reliance on documentary evidence is further reinforced in Manzi v King’s College Hospital NHS Trust [2018] EWCA Civ 1882 wherein the court states that clinical records are made in line with professional duties but also for the ongoing care and treatment of a patient. [read post]
7 Feb 2025, 10:58 am
[cite to Force v. [read post]
5 Feb 2025, 4:00 am
Since the Supreme Court’s 1898 decision in United States v. [read post]
28 Jan 2025, 11:54 am
SBA will not find that a minority shareholder has negative control where such minority shareholder has the authority to block action by the board of directors or shareholders that would (i) add a new equity stakeholder; (ii) dissolve a company; (iii) sell the company or all assets of the company; (iv) cause a merger of the company; (v) declare bankruptcy; or (vi) amend the company’s corporate governance documents to remove the shareholders’ authority to block any of (i) through… [read post]
25 Jan 2025, 9:53 pm
DeJoy and Kennedy v. [read post]
24 Jan 2025, 8:34 am
At the FTC, we saw a flood of commission actions—a few conventional ones and a spate of matters that seemed conspicuously rushed. [read post]
