Search for: "State v. Rye" Results 61 - 80 of 100
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 May 2020, 10:30 am by Guest Blogger
Supreme Court decision in Texas v. [read post]
23 Jul 2019, 6:36 am by Kate Fort
” The weakness in this language was exploited in Rye v. [read post]
4 May 2021, 4:22 am by Charles Sartain
Co-author Brittany Blakey The Texas Supreme Court in Concho Resources, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 6:56 am by Neil Rosenbaum
  Defendant Heart Attack Grill (HAG) in Jack Lebewohl et al. v. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 7:33 pm by jefhenninger
The Indictment further charges CHERICO with obstruction of justice, and conspiracy to obstruct justice, in connection with the 2003 sentencing of DOMINICK DeVITO, following DeVITO’s conviction in United States v. [read post]
9 Aug 2009, 1:21 pm
They argued that eBay and the later case of Winter v Nat'l Res. [read post]
5 Jul 2009, 2:23 pm
Caught in the Rye On Wednesday, District Judge Batts granted a preliminary injunction against the publication of the sequel 60 Years Later: Coming Through the Rye in the United States. [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 4:09 am by The Law Offices of John Day, P.C.
Much later, the State amended its answer to allege fault by the City of Clarksville. [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 6:45 am
(Afro-IP)   Spain Trade mark cancellation and damages: a matter of (bad) faith (Class 46)   United Kingdom EWHC (Pat): No ruling on hypothetical issue: MMI Research Ltd v Cellxion Ltd (IPKat) EWHC (Pat): EP 258 valid in Netherlands but not UK: Novartis AG and Cibavision AG v Johnson & Johnson Medical Ltd & Ors (PatLit) EWHC: Trial judge says ‘Boileau’ to patent licence; appeal court agrees: Oxonica Energy Ltd v Neuftec… [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 3:00 am
(Spicy IP) Design v copyright: need for a clear and rational distinction: Microfibres v Giridhar & Co & Ors (Spicy IP) Madras High Court: jurisdiction - can design infringement case can be filed in Court where plaintiff resides? [read post]
21 Jun 2009, 10:00 pm
(ITC 337 Law Blog) Academic perspectives on issues raised in Bilski case (IP Osgoode) Star Scientific teaches a valuable lesson to all IP share investors (IAM) US Patents – Decisions CAFC: Appealing BPAI rejections to the Federal Circuit: In re Baggett (nonprecedential) (Patently-O) CAFC: Preliminary injunctions and obviousness in design patent law: Titan Tire Corp v Case New Holland, Inc (Patently-O) District Court N D Illinois: Post-filing assignment cannot create standing:… [read post]