Search for: "State v. Sanders" Results 81 - 100 of 790
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Mar 2019, 10:16 am by Margaret Taylor
They lay out concerns about current members of the White House staff in addition to Kushner, including questions about whether Trump’s second national security adviser, John Bolton, revealed on his security clearance application his work with Maria Butina (who pleaded guilty in December 2018 to conspiring with senior Russian official Alexander Torshin to infiltrate the conservative movement in the United States as an agent of the Russian government). [read post]
8 Mar 2019, 2:05 pm by Colin E. Flora
Sanders: For the first time, the Indiana Court of Appeals has interpreted the catchall provision of the Indiana Deceptive Consumer Sales Act and has held that it is sufficient to incorporate violations of Ind. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
Because Democrats have passed laws in some states to protect the status quo, should the Supreme Court—freshly packed by Republicans with extreme ideologues—turn the question of abortion rights back to the states by overturning Roe v. [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 4:17 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Likewise, the allegations of defamation failed to state a cause of action. [read post]
7 Dec 2018, 4:05 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Sanders v Grenadier Realty, Inc., 102 AD3d 460, 461 (1st Dept 2013) (precluding re-litigation of issues underlying state claim where identical issues underlying claim were decided by federal court that had refused to exercise jurisdiction over state claims); see also Hudson v Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc., 138 AD3d 511, 515 (1st Dept 2016), lv to appeal denied, 28 NY3d 902 (2016) (party estopped from relitigating “discrete… [read post]
12 Nov 2018, 5:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
Changing the Senate is effectively impossible, because Article V requires every state's consent. [read post]
2 Nov 2018, 9:54 am by Camille Fischer
EFF is filing an amicus letter in support of a petition for review, asking the California Supreme Court to overturn a harmful appellate court decision in Sander v. [read post]