Search for: "State v. Scarborough" Results 1 - 20 of 85
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Mar 2012, 1:41 pm by WIMS
Scarborough Citizens alleged that easements conveyed by the State on the parcel of land violate the law.       [read post]
23 Nov 2012, 12:00 am
The warning states: Consumer protection: The string [.attorney/.lawyer] is linked to a regulated market sector, and [applicant] does not appear to have proposed sufficient mechanisms to minimise potential consumer harm. [read post]
12 Jul 2016, 8:28 am by Robert D. Williams
The wait is over: a judgment has been issued in the Philippines v. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 3:33 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Carter, 68 AD3d 750 [2d Dept 20091; Scarborough v Napoli, Kaiser & Bern, LLP, 63 AD3d 153[4th Dept]], rearg. denied, 66 AD3d 1.50 [2009]). [read post]
24 Nov 2006, 1:37 pm
  United   States, 546 U.S. 12, 126 S.Ct. 403 (2005), and Kontrick v. [read post]
30 Apr 2016, 7:34 am by Alex R. McQuade
Julian Ku asked whether the United States has a legal obligation to defend the Scarborough Shoal for the Philippines. [read post]
30 Apr 2016, 7:34 am by Alex R. McQuade
Julian Ku asked whether the United States has a legal obligation to defend the Scarborough Shoal for the Philippines. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 7:18 am by Lyle Denniston
In rejecting the challenge, the Ninth Circuit, Justice Thomas noted in dissent from denial of review, had ruled that the Supreme Court’s 1977 decision in Scarborough v. [read post]