Search for: "State v. Schweppe" Results 1 - 20 of 26
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Nov 2019, 11:03 am
The CJEU stated that European Union law does not preclude the proprietor of a national trademark from opposing the import of identical goods bearing the same trade mark and coming from another Member State, in which said trade mark, which initially belonged to the same proprietor, is currently owned by a third party. [read post]
19 Nov 2012, 1:31 am by GuestPost
We are pleased to welcome this guest post from Jennifer Schweppe, Lecturer in Law, University of Limerick. [read post]
26 Sep 2017, 1:09 am by Jani Ihalainen
In the light of this silence, a case has recently been referred to the CJEU, and ahead of its decision an Advocate General stepped in to provide some well-needed insight into the law and its interpretation.The case of Schweppes SA v Red Paralela SL related to the sale of soda water. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 2:15 am by war
Playcorp v bodum [54] to [62]). [read post]
9 Jan 2018, 1:12 am by Jani Ihalainen
The matter finally landed on the CJEU's desk, which rendered their decision in late December.As a short recap, the case of Schweppes SA v Red Paralela SL dealt with the sale of Schweppes' tonic water, for which the company owned several trademarks in many jurisdictions. [read post]
23 Sep 2019, 9:30 pm by Mitra Sharafi
Cadbury Schweppes and Cadbury Schweppes Overseas (2006): CFC Rules Under EU Tax LawChristiana HJI Panayi20. [read post]
13 Dec 2007, 3:25 am
C-446/03, Marks & Spencer and C-196/04, Cadbury Schweppes).The Court held that the situation in the main proceedings did not fall within the scope of Directive 90/435. [read post]
20 Jun 2016, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
From SSRN:Debbie Kaminer, Religious Accommodation in the American Workplace: The Impact of the Supreme Court's Decision in EEOC v. [read post]
14 Nov 2019, 6:43 am
InternKat Riana Harvey gave us the details.As a consequence of a voluntary assignment of Schweppes Cadbury’s trade marks to the Coca Cola Group in 1998, the ownership of the ‘Schweppes’ brand belongs to two fiercely competing business groups: The Schweppes Group holds the exclusive rights over the ‘Schweppes’ brand in Spain, among other countries, while the Coca-Cola Group holds the rights over the ‘Schweppes’… [read post]
21 Jan 2018, 5:58 am
MARQUESalso posts on the recent CJEU opinion, Red Paralela and others v Orangina Schweppes, concerning the effect of the exhaustion of rights rule of Article 7(1) Trademark Directive on the right of a trademark owner to oppose the importation of goods affixed with the trademark, when the trademark was placed on the goods by an assignee of the trademark in another EEA member state. [read post]
9 Feb 2014, 2:27 pm
 Early developmentThe point of an evolving concept was illustrated further by reference to the leading case of Cadbury Schweppes Pty Ltd v Pub Squash Co. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 10:39 pm by GuestPost
This guest post is by Jennifer Schweppe of the School of Law at the University of Limerick. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 12:46 pm
Pulse Electronics and Stryker Corp. v. [read post]
13 Jun 2016, 12:49 pm
* BREAKING: CJEU says that fair compensation for private copying cannot be funded through general state budgetThe CJEU has considered the freedom of implementing the private copying exception, which may be broad but not so broad as to allow for fair compensation to be funded from the general state budget. [read post]
29 Nov 2016, 2:44 am
  The Defendants accepted that the Claimant had a reputation in its cups but denied that the Claimant had acquired goodwill in the get-up.The Defendants' cupsThe key English cases on passing off of shape and/or get-up were considered from Reckitt & Colman v Borden (Jif Lemon) to Schweppes v Gibbens and, more recently, Numatic v Qualtex. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 3:13 am by New Books Script
Thirty years of legal scholarship / Thomas Mohr and Jennifer Schweppe, editors. [read post]
27 May 2013, 4:18 am by Barry Sookman
In this case, Mrs Sig neither had the trade secrets nor knew that they were being misused, and therefore she did not share one of the features of the design which rendered it wrongful, namely the necessary state of knowledge or state of mind. [read post]
30 May 2016, 10:00 am
| Google Books legal saga ends | s52 CPDA repeal comes into force 28 July 2016 | The latest Jack Wills v House of Fraser judgment [read post]
21 Jun 2016, 2:56 am
 | Justice Slade delivers judgement in Arthur J Gallagher Services v Skriptchenko Never too late 99 [week ending on Sunday 5 June] German Constitutional Court sends sampling saga into another loop | Who should pay for the independence of the Boards of Appeal? [read post]