Search for: "State v. Sealy"
Results 1 - 20
of 29
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Aug 2020, 1:39 pm
Union Co. v. [read post]
22 Dec 2023, 6:00 am
The company states that they meticulously develop, manufacture, and market products under various trademarks such as TEMPUR, TEMPUR-PEDIC, and TEMPUR SEALY. [read post]
30 Apr 2009, 10:43 am
I don’t think there is any significant point of law or practice in Lemas and Sealy v Williams [2009] EWCA Civ 360, but it is a strange case (although one suspects many readers will have been involved in similarly chaotic cases at one stage or another) and worthy of a short note. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 7:00 pm
Tempur Sealy Int’l Inc. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 2:31 pm
Hoeller v. [read post]
14 Apr 2014, 5:11 am
Collins v. [read post]
1 Jul 2018, 8:16 am
Trademark * Carter v. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 3:00 am
These and other questions are addressed in a recent decision of interest by the Brooklyn Surrogate's Court in Sealy v. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 4:30 am
United States, 28 F.2d 1017 (2d Cir. 1928)Rouda v. [read post]
11 Jan 2023, 7:13 am
The lawsuit references the precedent set in the Supreme Court case Grutter v. [read post]
1 May 2014, 9:57 am
Dodson v. [read post]
23 Aug 2017, 4:00 am
In Taylor & Lieberman v. [read post]
1 Jan 2014, 8:21 am
Select Comfort Corp. v. [read post]
10 Jan 2014, 2:46 pm
Tempur Sealy International, Inc., 2013 WL 6767821 (D. [read post]
9 Jun 2010, 2:30 pm
The Court cited United States v. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 4:06 am
In Sealy v Clifton, LLC (68 AD3d 846 [2d Dept 2009]), the Second Department held that an individual plaintiff, who owned a 50% interest in an limited liability company, did not have "legal capacity to sue" for partition of a property owned by a limited liability company of which he was member. [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 7:40 am
The '088 patent is currently the subject of a litigation styled Sealy Technology v. [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 7:40 am
The '088 patent is currently the subject of a litigation styled Sealy Technology v. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 8:00 am
Tempur Sealy International, Inc. et al. v. [read post]
27 Mar 2009, 7:20 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: US CAFC: Continuation limits invalid; limits on claims and RCEs are ok: Tafas v Doll (Patently-O) (Law360) (Hal Wegner) (IAM) (Patent Baristas) (Promote the Progress) (Patent Docs) (Patent Docs) (Patent Docs) (IP Spotlight) (Inventive Step) (IP Watchdog) (Washington State Patent Law Blog) (Anticipate This!) [read post]
