Search for: "State v. Sears" Results 41 - 60 of 541
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 May 2023, 2:40 pm by Bill Marler
Abstract available online at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18494694 Benson, V. and Merano, M.A., “Current estimates from the National Health Interview Survey 1995,” VITAL HEALTH STATISTICS, SERIES 10 (Nat’l Center for Health Statistics 1998). [read post]
20 Apr 2023, 10:26 am by Ronald Mann
This is the second decision in the past month, following Wilkins v United States, reversing a lower court holding that a particular statute is jurisdictional, ruling instead that the statute is merely a “precondition to relief. [read post]
21 Feb 2023, 7:35 am by CMS
In this post, Rachel Free (Partner), Toby Sears (Partner) and Omri Shirion (Associate) of the CMS Intellectual Property team, preview the UK Supreme Court’s upcoming hearing of Thaler v Comptroller-General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks. [read post]
11 Feb 2023, 8:13 pm by Bill Marler
An Introduction to Norovirus The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) estimates that noroviruses cause nearly 21 million cases of acute gastroenteritis annually, making noroviruses the leading cause of gastroenteritis in adults in the United States. [5, 9, 13, 31]  According to a relatively recent article in the New England Journal of Medicine,  The Norwalk agent was the first virus that was identified as causing gastroenteritis in humans, but recognition of its… [read post]
30 Jan 2023, 11:26 am by INFORRM
On 25 January 2023, there was a hearing in the case of Forensic Risk Ltd v Akisanya (KB-2022-004582). [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 8:00 am by Guest Blogger
  Until relatively recently, Article V and the hurdles it presented to formal constitutional amendment was seen as a feature rather than a bug, especially if one credited the constitutional theories of esteemed scholars like David Strauss or Bruce Ackerman. [read post]
29 Nov 2022, 4:13 am by Bernard Bell
Sears Roebuck, 421 U.S. 132, 150-53 (1975)(recognizing the deliberative process privilege, but limiting it to pre-decisional documents); EPA v. [read post]