Search for: "State v. See" Results 161 - 180 of 80,904
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Dec 2009, 7:17 am
My opening argument starts at about 39:00, and lasts for about five minutes; it’s followed by the State’s argument, followed by about five minutes of my rebuttal. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 5:00 pm by Zachary Spilman
Virginia, 443 U.S. 307, 319 (1979); see United States v. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 1:00 am by Guy Stuckey-Clarke, Olswang LLP
In November 2000, the High Court (Laws LJ and Gibbs J) gave judgment in favour of Mr Bancoult, a Chagos Islander, in granting a High Court order quashing the Immigration Ordinance 1971, s 4; see R (Bancoult) v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs [2001] QB 1067 (“Bancoult (1)”). [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 9:39 am by jleaming@acslaw.org
See “SB1070 in the Supreme Court,” their pre-oral argument analysis for ACSblog. [read post]
24 Aug 2017, 10:26 am by Evidence ProfBlogger
Willis, 2016 WL 9115484 (Minn. 2016), many states answer this question in the affirmative: See, e.g., People v. [read post]