Search for: "State v. Self"
Results 101 - 120
of 14,984
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Apr 2023, 4:30 am
As I noted in the Verdict column, United States v. [read post]
20 Apr 2023, 9:01 pm
That was certainly true of the recent Supreme Court oral argument in Counterman v. [read post]
19 Apr 2023, 8:52 am
From Judge Carlton Reeves' decision today in Andreacchio v. [read post]
18 Apr 2023, 10:09 am
Yes, constitutional law has been used to oppress Native people, but at the same time, we want to bring to the fore how Native arguments led, for example, to seminal cases such as Worcester v. [read post]
18 Apr 2023, 9:45 am
The court in Hurry Family Revocable Tr. v. [read post]
18 Apr 2023, 4:34 am
The question in Exxon Mobil v. [read post]
18 Apr 2023, 4:00 am
By Eric SegallTomorrow the Supreme Court hears oral arguments in Counterman v. [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 11:40 am
On Tuesday in Groff v. [read post]
16 Apr 2023, 7:52 am
” I wonder if the plaintiff knows that Musk is a self-styled free speech absolutist who would never do such a thing? [read post]
15 Apr 2023, 7:27 pm
Tingley v. [read post]
15 Apr 2023, 5:03 pm
Without reaching trial or a verdict, the Dominion Voting Systems v. [read post]
14 Apr 2023, 4:41 pm
” Take care with that social media duty of care October 2018: “[Rhodes v OPO] aptly illustrates the caution that has to be exercised in applying physical world concepts of harm, injury and safety to communication and speech, even before considering the further step of imposing a duty of care on a platform to take steps to reduce the risk of their occurrence as between third parties, or the yet further step of appointing a regulator to superintend the platform’s… [read post]
14 Apr 2023, 12:30 pm
Your case is dismissed under Rooker-Feldman and Younger *and* Heck v. [read post]
14 Apr 2023, 5:56 am
Given their stated concern about the need to license non-essential patents belonging to SEP owners, the draft regulation is counterproductive for their purposes. [read post]
14 Apr 2023, 4:52 am
” With regard to plaintiff’s account stated claim, defendant asserted, without corroboration, that she had objected to the invoices at various points, but those “self-serving, bald allegations of oral protests were insufficient to raise a triable issue of fact as to the existence of an account stated” (Darby & Darby v VSI Intl., 95 NY2d 308, 315 [2000]; accord Schlenker v Cascino, 124 AD3d at 1153). [read post]
14 Apr 2023, 1:50 am
As a matter of English law, if a state, as principal, represents that a person had authority to act on its behalf, it will be bound by the acts of that person with respect to anyone dealing with him as an agent on the faith of that representation (Attorney General of Ceylon v Silva (AD) [1953] A.C. 461). [read post]
13 Apr 2023, 3:03 pm
In Marbury v. [read post]
12 Apr 2023, 7:35 am
” Take care with that social media duty of care October 2018: “[Rhodes v OPO] aptly illustrates the caution that has to be exercised in applying physical world concepts of harm, injury and safety to communication and speech, even before considering the further step of imposing a duty of care on a platform to take steps to reduce the risk of their occurrence as between third parties, or the yet further step of appointing a regulator to superintend the platform’s… [read post]
12 Apr 2023, 6:13 am
See Chaker v. [read post]
12 Apr 2023, 4:00 am
As the Supreme Court held in Heck v. [read post]
