Search for: "State v. Sette"
Results 1 - 16
of 16
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jun 2011, 3:32 pm
Massachu- setts, 557 U. [read post]
27 Jun 2007, 11:32 am
One of the passengers in Sett's car was killed. [read post]
4 Mar 2016, 11:16 am
See, e.g., Washington v. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 3:34 am
**********PREVIOUSLY, ON NEVER TOO LATENever Too Late 73 [week ending on Sunday 22 November] – Xmas present from Benelux PTO | Eponia never ending troubles | Prof Dr Siegfried Broß v EPO | Protection of formats in the Netherlands | Eponia never ending proceedings | UK intensifies its Cracking Ideas programme | Anne Frank's Diary copyright | Transport for London and IP | CJEU in SBS Belgium v SABAM Case… [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 12:56 pm
.* Jeremy Phillips' words of warning- and some further thoughtsStarting from Jeremy's words at the 10th anniversary JIPLP program, Neil reflects on the state of IP in the universities. [read post]
20 Sep 2009, 7:32 pm
In a recent case of Sett v. [read post]
23 Nov 2015, 2:40 pm
At the end of October, as part of the China state visit to the UK, the China-Britain Business Council and British Chamber of Commerce in China hosted the third UK-China Intellectual Property Symposium at The Royal Society. [read post]
18 Mar 2016, 2:37 am
Commonwealth v. [read post]
28 May 2008, 2:02 am
The Court has referred in its reasoning to the ILC Articles on Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts in its Judgment on the merits in the Congo v. [read post]
7 Jan 2016, 9:21 am
The CCDI has identified state-owned enterprises as its focus this year. [read post]
16 Feb 2017, 6:21 am
The case is Tartan Army Ltd v Sett GmbH and Others [2017] CSOH 22. [read post]
12 Jan 2008, 1:12 pm
For cases try Gay v Sheeran & Anor [1999] EWCA Civ 1621 or Newlon Housing Trust v. [read post]
24 Aug 2015, 9:00 am
Commonwealth v. [read post]
5 Jan 2020, 2:52 pm
Supreme Court’s March 2018 entry of its opinion in Cyan, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Jul 2017, 12:00 pm
Most notably, in Hoyt v. [read post]
4 May 2021, 1:03 pm
However, it is more specific in section 17(2): That legal aid services should, i. promote access to justice, ii. be efficient, effective and high-quality, iii. be provided in a client-focused, innovative, transparent and accountable manner, iv. be responsive to the needs of low-income individuals and disadvantaged communities in Ontario, v. promote early resolution, where appropriate, and vi. be co-ordinated with other aspects of the justice system and with community services. (2020 Act,… [read post]
