Search for: "State v. Sheets" Results 1 - 20 of 2,464
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jun 2007, 2:15 am
Fact sheet not unambiguous Hooper v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions Court of Appeal “A government fact sheet was not clear and unambiguous enough so that overpayments of incapacity benefit were not recoverable from a person receiving the benefit who took up part-time paid employment without notifying the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions in breach of statute. [read post]
21 Feb 2007, 2:44 am
The patented method uses partially carbonized fibers that are then processed into sheets for use on military aircraft.Lockheed Martin was accused of using Zoltek's patented process to produce carbon-fiber sheets and imported these materials into the United States for use in making the F-22Fighter Plane pursuant to a contract with the federal government to design and build F-22 stealth fighters.Zoltek sued Lockheed and the US government in the CFC under 28 U.S.C. [read post]
1 Dec 2021, 4:59 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Merits Stage Materials Cert Stage Materials Cert Petition Appendix United States’ Brief in Opposition Tenth Circuit Materials United States v Denezpi Tenth Circuit Opinion Denezpi Opening Brief US Answer Brief Reply Brief District Court Materials 1 Indictment 1-1 Criminal Information Sheet 14 DCT Detention Order 29 Denezpi Motion to Dismiss 29-1 CFR Pleadings 30 US Response 31 Reply 31-1 CFR Court Forms 32 DCT Order Denying… [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 5:00 am by Bexis
  No superiority due to multiple state laws.Dimich v. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 1:31 pm by Daily Record Staff
Criminal procedure — Jury sheet — Legally inconsistent verdict A jury in the Circuit Court for Baltimore City convicted appellant, Kevin Tusing, of first-degree assault, second-degree assault, three counts of reckless endangerment, and three counts of carrying a dangerous weapon openly with intent to injure. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 12:39 pm by Shima Baradaran
There has been much discussion in the news, blogosphere, and general ruminations about the Supreme Court's January opinion in United States v. [read post]