Search for: "State v. Sheffield" Results 1 - 20 of 123
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 May 2023, 12:19 am by David Pocklington
WATCH states that the Independent Reviewer has recognised its concerns and has initiated an inquiry. [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 5:09 am by Robert Kossick
While none of these tools is foolproof (all have reliability limitations and/or affordability issues), these do represent the current state of the art when it comes to the means that are available for maximizing UFLPA compliance. [read post]
22 Sep 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
A second follow-up case, Steinmetz et al v Germany, was filed in 2022. [read post]
25 Jun 2022, 5:59 am by jonathanturley
At The University of Chicago Law School, Ginsburg stated on the 40th anniversary of Roe v. [read post]
12 Jun 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Thus, for those frustrated with (or openly hostile to) particular elements of the Constitution, such as Article V, brevity has provided a path forward. [read post]
7 Apr 2022, 9:00 am by Phil Dixon
There was therefore no error in the case. (1) Defendant’s challenge to the second step of the Batson analysis was preserved; (2) The State’s proffered explanations for its use of peremptory challenges were racially neutral; (3) The trial court did not clearly err in finding that the defendant failed to show purposeful discrimination under the totality of circumstances State v. [read post]
27 Nov 2020, 11:24 pm
See also my short note here.Prospective Adopters v Sheffield City Council [2020] EWCA Civ 1591 (26 November 2020)Appeal by prospective adopters against striking out of adoption application. [read post]
22 Aug 2020, 7:37 am
Shah, The ‘Unwilling’ and ‘Unable’ Test in International Law: The Use of Force against Non-State Actors in Pakistan and Afghanistan Steve Foster, Reconciling Religious Speech with the Duty to Maintain Equality and Diversity: The Decision in Ngole v Sheffield University  Fatima Ahdash, Childhood Radicalisation and Parental Extremism: How Should Family Law Respond? [read post]