Search for: "State v. Sheffield"
Results 41 - 60
of 123
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Apr 2011, 1:51 am
BM v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWCA Civ 366 (05 April 2011) - Read judgment Another control order has been ruled unlawful and quashed by the court of appeal, on the basis that the evidence relied upon to impose it was “too vague and speculative”. [read post]
6 Sep 2014, 7:25 am
Monika Salata v. [read post]
10 Mar 2023, 10:38 am
Co. v. [read post]
23 Nov 2012, 12:00 am
This is contained in the Companies Act 2006 (which replaced the Business Names Act 1985) and, pursuant to section 55, requires businesses to, for example, seek the permission of the Secretary of State for Business, Enterprise & Regulatory Reform before using the term Patent, Registered or Sheffield in a business name. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 8:29 am
Tamburlaine and Henry V”R. [read post]
13 Apr 2021, 9:53 am
The case, Brom and Bett v. [read post]
2 Feb 2011, 10:59 pm
First, following Mr Justice Munby in Re E (an Alleged Patient); Sheffield City Council v E and S [2004] EWHC 2808 (Fam), he compared sexual consent to consenting to marriage. [read post]
16 Aug 2007, 5:50 pm
Here's how the court in the linked-to opinion summarized the elements of this claim in Florida: Following the reasoning in [Sheffield v. [read post]
12 Sep 2014, 8:00 am
Doe v. [read post]
21 Aug 2018, 8:00 am
Clifford v. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 10:42 am
See State v. [read post]
25 Jul 2017, 1:56 am
He says that is not something on which there is a margin of appreciation to the state. [read post]
14 Feb 2010, 12:28 pm
Sheffield City Council v Oliver concerned one of the mandatory paragraphs and should not be taken to mean that all the paragraphs would be implied into the lease by force of statute. [read post]
14 Feb 2010, 12:28 pm
Sheffield City Council v Oliver concerned one of the mandatory paragraphs and should not be taken to mean that all the paragraphs would be implied into the lease by force of statute. [read post]
14 Jan 2012, 3:30 am
(Decision: The Government of the United States of America v Richard O’Dwyer – PDF). [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 8:00 am
Petralia v. [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 9:58 pm
It has been widely debated in recent cases (R (Smith) v Secretary for Defence [2010] UKSC 29 (see our post); Al-Skeini & Others v Secretary of State for Defence [2008] 1 AC 153, currently before the Grand Chamber; Bankovic v Belgium [2001] 11 BHRC 435) whether Article 1 ECHR guarantees the rights and freedoms of the Convention to those outside of the State’s jurisdiction. [read post]
21 May 2015, 7:53 am
See Seitz v. [read post]
14 Sep 2016, 8:00 am
In one important Illinois Appellate Court decision, People v. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 3:29 am
On Tuesday 3 November 2009 at Sheffield Crown Court a jury was sworn in to hear the trial of Ryan Ward for murder. [read post]
