Search for: "State v. Sheldon"
Results 241 - 260
of 375
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 May 2012, 2:35 am
"For the reasons stated in Fortress Credit Corp. v Dechert LLP (89 AD3d 615 [2011]) — a case involving virtually identical facts and allegations — the complaint in this action fails to state claims for fraud, legal malpractice, negligence, negligent misrepresentation, and breach of fiduciary duty. [read post]
23 May 2012, 3:18 pm
Sheldon Whitehouse, Eric Schwaab, Peter Shelley and Anne Hayden. [read post]
23 May 2012, 12:14 pm
The case is American Tradition Partnership, Inc., et al., v. [read post]
22 May 2012, 9:23 am
The petition of the day is: American Tradition Partnership, Inc. v. [read post]
21 May 2012, 6:32 am
In the Washington Post, Robert Barnes discusses amicus briefs filed on both sides in American Tradition Partnership, Inc. v. [read post]
21 May 2012, 4:31 am
John McCain (R-Ariz.) and Sheldon Whitehouse (D-R.I.) told the court. [read post]
18 May 2012, 3:52 pm
” The Senators’ brief, filed in American Tradition Partnership v. [read post]
16 May 2012, 7:37 am
Legal Risks Under International Privacy Laws – bit.ly/JyhIRp (Sheldon, Mark & Anderson) Cyber-Threat Cooperation Emerging Between U.S. [read post]
1 May 2012, 6:03 am
., V. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 12:58 pm
Raed Mahajna v Secretary of State for the Home Department IA/21/21631/2011 – read judgment 1 Crown Office Row’s Neil Sheldon appeared for the Secretary of State in this case. [read post]
19 Apr 2012, 7:08 pm
Supreme Court’s June 23, 2011 landmark decision in PLIVA Inc. v. [read post]
14 Apr 2012, 11:13 am
ISDA and SIFMA v. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 12:10 pm
One Year After The Hearing In Pliva v. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 9:06 pm
But the Court returned to a strict interpretation of the ban in 1962, in the case of Enochs v. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am
Taft, Anti-Semitism in the United States (1920) Benjamin N. [read post]
18 Feb 2012, 5:49 pm
” For example, Newt Gingrich’s patron Sheldon Adelson and Rick Santorum’s patron Foster Friess are individuals, not corporations; they are currently contributing through Super PACs protected by Citizens United, but they otherwise could spend on their own even without that decision. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 2:18 am
Supreme Court stated in its 2010 Citizens United v. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 7:03 pm
The 2012 election will be our first presidential election since the Supreme Court’s decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 10:28 am
Floyd said no—individuals could always spend as much as they wanted on elections since Buckley v. [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 12:24 pm
I agree with much of what she says about the corrosive impact of SuperPacs (and the roles played by such billionaires as Sheldon Adelson). [read post]
