Search for: "State v. Sheldon" Results 261 - 280 of 367
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Nov 2011, 9:00 pm
Otherwise, the Supreme Court wrote in its 1992 case Quill Corp. v. [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 2:12 pm by Matthew Flinn
Raed Mahajna v Secretary of State for the Home Department IA/21/21631/2011 – Read Judgment 1 Crown Office Row’s Neil Sheldon appeared for the Secretary of State in this case. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 3:12 pm by James R. Marsh
Courts have similarly determined that an offender’s possession of child abuse images causes harm to the depicted children.The United States Supreme Court first acknowledged such harm in 1982 in New York v. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 3:18 am by New Books Script
22 new acquisitions for the Osgoode Hall Law School Library, including 18 from 2011: Pioneers in criminology and criminal justice : Sheldon and Eleanor Touroff Glueck : a retrospective exhibition honoring Professor Sheldon Glueck and Dr. [read post]
2 Oct 2011, 10:07 am by Rachit Buch
  1 Crown Office Row’s Neil Sheldon appeared for the Secretary of State in this case. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 2:29 pm by Ari Waldman
Would the severability clause – which, a friend reminded me, is not always sacroscant (United States v. [read post]
27 May 2011, 11:00 am by Jon Tracy
 U.S. v Averette (1970) significantly changed its applicability, as the Court of Military Appeals decided that the UCMJ only applied to civilians in times of formally declared war. [read post]
22 Apr 2011, 8:49 am by Dwight Sullivan
Sheldon, Esquire, is Luke’s counsel of record. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 1:26 pm by WIMS
EPW Hearing State & Local Perspectives On Transportation Morrison Enterprises  v. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 9:01 am by Roshonda Scipio
Intellectual PropertyKF2979 .H357 2011Fundamentals of United States intellectual property law : copyright, patent, and trademark / Sheldon W. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 6:16 am by Adam Wagner
Quila & Ors v Secretary of State for the Home Department & Ors [2010] EWCA Civ 1482 – Read judgment A key part of the government’s strategy to combat forced marriages, preventing people under the age of 21 from entering the country to marry, has been heavily criticised by the Court of Appeal. [read post]
31 Dec 2010, 5:32 pm by Thaddeus Hoffmeister
Best Pro Bono Effort by a Trial Consultant Beth Bonora and David Sheldon Most Significant Jury Related Case Thaler v. [read post]