Search for: "State v. Sheldon" Results 301 - 320 of 367
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Apr 2021, 11:37 am by Amy Howe
The case, Americans for Prosperity Foundation v. [read post]
14 Nov 2021, 12:19 am by Aaron Moss
During the finale, Walken’s character Frank Sheldon is tasked with painting over graffiti on the side of a building. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 2:29 pm by Ari Waldman
Would the severability clause – which, a friend reminded me, is not always sacroscant (United States v. [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 6:45 am
(Afro-IP)   Spain Trade mark cancellation and damages: a matter of (bad) faith (Class 46)   United Kingdom EWHC (Pat): No ruling on hypothetical issue: MMI Research Ltd v Cellxion Ltd (IPKat) EWHC (Pat): EP 258 valid in Netherlands but not UK: Novartis AG and Cibavision AG v Johnson & Johnson Medical Ltd & Ors (PatLit) EWHC: Trial judge says ‘Boileau’ to patent licence; appeal court agrees: Oxonica Energy Ltd v Neuftec… [read post]
1 Jan 2022, 5:12 am by SHG
To use an example, did the Supreme Court’s decision in Brown v. [read post]
18 Feb 2012, 5:49 pm by Tom Goldstein
”  For example, Newt Gingrich’s patron Sheldon Adelson and Rick Santorum’s patron Foster Friess are individuals, not corporations; they are currently contributing through Super PACs protected by Citizens United, but they otherwise could spend on their own even without that decision. [read post]
25 Nov 2007, 7:20 am
The following is a Cerebral Palsy Resource Guide for the State of Michigan. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 11:36 am by stevemehta
Straw, although “stunned,” did not state there was no settlement. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 11:36 am by stevemehta
Straw, although “stunned,” did not state there was no settlement. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 8:17 am by Sanford Levinson
  To be sure, Bickel was more than willing  to defend Brown v. [read post]
19 Apr 2015, 8:15 am by SHG
(And “he” isn’t Sheldon Adelson, for those who have been speculating on that). [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 9:45 am by Gordon Todd
Circuit’s unanimous en banc opinion in SpeechNow.org v. [read post]