Search for: "State v. Sheppard" Results 81 - 100 of 436
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 May 2020, 4:51 pm by Adam Rosenthal and Robert Foster
  According to the FMCSA, commercial trucking employers who meet those requirements do not need to comply with state meal and rest period laws because the HOS regulations preempt state law. [read post]
28 May 2020, 3:07 pm by Townsend Bourne and Nikole Snyder
      During a May 15, 2020 meeting of the Coalition for Government Procurement, attended virtually by Sheppard Mullin attorney Townsend Bourne, Ms. [read post]
14 May 2020, 3:41 pm by Y. Douglas Yang
Sheppard Mullin is committed to providing employers with updated information regarding COVID-19 and its impact on the workplace. [read post]
13 May 2020, 4:18 pm by Nirav Bhatt and Bijal Vira
This analysis represents our best interpretation and recommendations based on where things currently stand.* Check out Sheppard Mullin’s Coronavirus Insights Portal which now aggregates the firm’s various COVID-19 blog posts on a broad range of topics. [read post]
1 May 2020, 3:40 pm by Bijal Vira and Nirav Bhatt
This analysis represents our best interpretation and recommendations based on where things currently stand.* Check out Sheppard Mullin’s Coronavirus Insights Portal which now aggregates the firm’s various COVID-19 blog posts on a broad range of topics. [read post]
3 Apr 2020, 6:23 pm by Bijal Vira and Nirav Bhatt
Additional Limitations on Use of Proceeds and Enforcement for Unauthorized Uses The Interim Final Rule states that not more than 25% of the loan forgiveness amount may be attributable to non-payroll costs. [read post]
23 Mar 2020, 4:21 pm by Kandace Watson
Please contact your Sheppard Mullin attorney contact for additional information.* [1] Marchand v. [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 10:52 am by Whitney Jones Roy and Angela Reid
  Specifically, the Court found that declining to hear Cal Chambers’ claim was appropriate because Cal Chambers appeared to be seeking to avoid an unfavorable decision in a state case (CERT v. [read post]