Search for: "State v. Sherrill"
Results 1 - 20
of 64
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Apr 2024, 5:00 am
Inst. v. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 9:22 am
First, states’ rights. [read post]
3 Oct 2023, 6:00 am
Capobianco v Ambach, 112 AD2d 640 [3d Dept 1985]). [read post]
3 Oct 2023, 6:00 am
Capobianco v Ambach, 112 AD2d 640 [3d Dept 1985]). [read post]
16 Jul 2023, 10:41 pm
Patton State Hospital, State Compensation Insurance Fund, Defendants, 2023 Cal. [read post]
22 Jun 2023, 6:27 am
Claytor (Sherrill) v. [read post]
30 Nov 2022, 6:30 am
According to the opinions of Justices in the majority in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
1 Nov 2022, 11:45 am
(Sherrill v. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 1:12 pm
Fund, Inc. v Gantt, 796 F Supp 681, 684 [ED NY 1992]). [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 1:12 pm
Fund, Inc. v Gantt, 796 F Supp 681, 684 [ED NY 1992]). [read post]
26 Nov 2021, 5:08 am
Whether fee lands under plenary state and local taxation and regulation (per Sherrill) constitute “Indian lands” under IGRA because those lands are located within the Cayugas’ historic reservation. 3. [read post]
9 Mar 2021, 7:36 am
In Branzburg v. [read post]
19 Jan 2021, 10:43 am
In United States v. [read post]
17 Dec 2020, 12:24 am
"Other decisions involving administrative disciplinary charges served on police officer alleged to have associated with persons thought to have been engaged in criminal activities include Brinson v Safir, 255 AD2d 247, leave to appeal denied 93 NY2d 805; Richardson v Safir, 258 AD2d 328; Delgado v Kerik, 294 A.D.2d 227 and Hastings v City of Sherrill, 90 AD3 1586. [read post]
17 Dec 2020, 12:00 am
"Other decisions involving administrative disciplinary charges served on police officer alleged to have associated with persons thought to have been engaged in criminal activities include Brinson v Safir, 255 AD2d 247, leave to appeal denied 93 NY2d 805; Richardson v Safir, 258 AD2d 328; Delgado v Kerik, 294 A.D.2d 227 and Hastings v City of Sherrill, 90 AD3 1586. [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 7:18 am
Sherrill v. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 11:35 am
This reasoning is not just the subtext in many of the Court’s recent Indian law decisions; sometimes it’s the actual text, as in the Court’s 2005 decision City of Sherrill v. [read post]
31 Oct 2019, 1:56 pm
In a 2005 case called City of Sherrill v. [read post]
31 May 2019, 6:58 am
City of Sherrill v. [read post]
12 Apr 2019, 4:00 am
Thus, concluded the Appellate Division, the doctrine of laches does not bar the arbitration in this instance.Citing Sherrill v Grayco Bldrs., 64 NY2d 261, the Appellate Division opined that "[l]ike contract rights generally, a right to arbitration may be modified, waived or abandoned. [read post]
