Search for: "State v. Sherwood"
Results 1 - 20
of 98
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Sep 2007, 1:06 pm
In a recent case also involving Sherwood Partners as an assignee, Sherwood Partners v. [read post]
11 Sep 2007, 1:06 pm
In a recent case also involving Sherwood Partners as an assignee, Sherwood Partners v. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 2:57 pm
Insurer denied coverage of both claims stating that while both claims were covered by the policy, and that suits were filed against Insured within the Policy Period, Insurer did not receive notice of the suits until after the ninety-day notice requirement, and therefore was not obligated under the policy.Insured filed a complaint and a motion for summary judgment in the Circuit Court alleging that Insurer breached the Policy by denying the claims. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 7:37 am
State v. [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 12:31 pm
Karasik Seyfarth Synopsis: In EEOC v. [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 4:10 am
Claiming entitlement to payment for unused vacation and sick leave credit upon resignationSherwood v Town of Lancaster, 2010 NY Slip Op 06057, Decided on July 9, 2010, Appellate Division, Fourth DepartmentRichard J. [read post]
28 Nov 2009, 5:32 am
Sherwood v. [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 5:52 am
In Sherwood Steel Ltd. v. [read post]
27 Feb 2019, 9:46 am
Facts: This case (Sherwood v. [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 10:23 am
Sherwood v Town of Lancaster In this Article 78 case, the petitioner sought to appeal the Supreme Court ruling that he was ineligible to receive credit for unused vacation and sick leave accrued as of the date of his retirement. [read post]
28 Mar 2021, 5:00 pm
., Global Blue Group Holding AG v. [read post]
19 Oct 2015, 3:27 am
Peter Sherwood in Manzella v Caporuscio, 2015 NY Slip Op 31870(U)[Sup Ct NY County Oct. 6, 2015], granted summary judgment for the chef/majority member on his counterclaim against the minority member for breach of fiduciary duty and modified a prior Consent Order to authorize termination of the minority member’s employment for cause. [read post]
31 Jul 2017, 3:28 am
Justice Sherwood’s decision agreed with the defendant and dismissed the plaintiff’s claims demanding inspection of books and records of both the managing and real estate LLCs, for a number of reasons: While the complaint alleged that plaintiff made a pre-suit written demand as required by § 18-305, “the complaint does not state the purpose for the demand, nor that the written demand stated such a purpose. [read post]
20 May 2010, 8:40 am
Matthews v. [read post]
16 May 2018, 4:38 am
Peter Sherwood is something of a nightmare. [read post]
8 Mar 2021, 3:35 am
Peter Sherwood is the unusual government case in which a legal malpractice issue is inserted. [read post]
6 Mar 2016, 7:26 am
Ms L was the tenant of Newark & Sherwood. [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 11:55 am
Sherwood v. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 2:16 am
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Kear, R. v [2011] EWCA Crim 2663 (04 November 2011) Lawrence, R. v [2011] EWCA Crim 2609 (03 November 2011) Attorney General’s Reference Nos 61, 62 AND 63 of 2011 [2011] EWCA Crim 2619 (27 October 2011) Abdzahra, R. v [2011] EWCA Crim 2664 (04 November 2011) Bashir, R. v [2011] EWCA Crim 2763 (03 November 2011) Ciccarelli, R. v [2011] EWCA Crim 2665 (03 November 2011) Court of Appeal (Civil Division)… [read post]
12 Feb 2010, 6:21 am
New York State Appellate Division, Second Department: McCabe v. [read post]
