Search for: "State v. Silvas" Results 81 - 100 of 387
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Oct 2019, 4:07 am by Edith Roberts
The first two cases, Bostock v. [read post]
24 Aug 2019, 6:30 am by Dan Ernst
Citizens, 1919-1924Conveners: Kenneth Mack, Harvard Law School (kmack@law.harvard.edu), Laurie Wood, Florida State University (lmwood@fsu.edu), Jacqueline Briggs, University of Toronto - Centre for Criminology and Sociolegal Studies (jacq.briggs@mail.utoronto.ca), and John Wertheimer, Davidson College (jow [read post]
21 Aug 2019, 1:09 pm by Dan Ernst
”Anne Fleming, Georgetown Law (anne.fleming@law.georgetown.edu), ProfessorHousehold Borrowing and Bankruptcy in Jim Crow AmericaCaley Horan, MIT (cdhoran@mit.edu) Associate Professor “Investing in the stars: Astrology and capitalism in modern America”Gautham Rao, American University (grao@american.edu) American University, Associate Professor“The Master's State: Slavery and the American State. [read post]
30 May 2019, 12:29 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
GenomeWeb stated of the patent angle:The suit accuses Illumina of submitting patent applications that appropriated the plaintiffs' zip code sequence technology. [read post]
Lord Kerr noted in particular that the de Silva review had expressed doubt as to the role of state agents and concluded that that doubt was sufficient to warrant further investigation. [read post]
 Instead, Sir Desmond de Silva QC was appointed to conduct an independent non-statutory document based review into any state involvement in Mr Finucane’s murder. [read post]
25 Feb 2019, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Robinson v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 15 Nov 2018. [read post]
6 Feb 2019, 9:18 am by Ivana Kunda
In Agostinho da Silva Martins v Dekra Claims Services Portugal SA (C-149/18), between Mr Agostinho da Silva Martins, who suffered damages in a car accident, and the insurance company Dekra Claims Services Portugal SA, the CJEU was called to rule on two different issues of qualification: one related to the interpretation of Article 16 of the Rome II Regulation on overriding mandatory provisions and the other related to interpretation of Article 28 of Directive 2009/103 on… [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 12:44 pm
BNY Corporate Trustee Hannah Buxbaum & Jean d’Aspremont, Mysteries of extraterritoriality: RJR Nabisco, Inc. v European Community Patrick Kinsch, Chris Thomale & Fabien Marchadier, Beyond the State: How far can Rights Reach? [read post]
30 Nov 2018, 7:36 am by ASAD KHAN
The expansion of the doctrine meant that alleged family life without marriage came to be captured by it and as shown by Rodrigues da Silva, Hoogkamer v Netherlands (2007) 44 EHRR 34 the question became whether family life was created at a time when it was known that a mother’s immigration status was such that the persistence of family life with her minor Dutch daughter within the host state would from the outset be precarious. [read post]
27 Aug 2018, 5:15 pm by Brian Shiffrin
We again decline "to disavow our holding in Walston . . . that imposes an affirmative obligation on a trial court to create a record of compliance under CPL 310.30 and O'Rama" (People v Silva, 24 NY3d 294, 300  [2014], rearg denied 24 N.Y.3d 1216 [2015]; see People v Parker, — NY3d — [decided today]). [read post]