Search for: "State v. Simmons" Results 1 - 20 of 619
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Sep 2021, 3:30 am by Christopher Slobogin
” To Professor Simmons, this stance makes no sense. [read post]
22 Aug 2021, 4:54 pm by INFORRM
  It is intended to complement our United States: Monthly Round Up posts. [read post]
26 Jul 2021, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Simmons, Saint Paul's Trial Narrative in Acts: Imperium Romanum vs. [read post]
21 Jun 2021, 12:56 pm by Eve Ross
Supreme Court justice Thurgood Marshall later acknowledged [Pauli Murray’s first book, States’ Laws on Race and Color] as his ‘bible’ in the historic Brown v. [read post]
8 Jun 2021, 11:32 am by Eleonora Rosati
Darren Meale of Simmons & Simmons presents the ninth volume in his rundown of notable trade mark cases over the past six months. [read post]
23 May 2021, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
IPSO has published a number of rulings and resolutions statement since our last Round Up: 02697-21 Roberts v, 1 Accuracy (2019), Resolved – IPSO mediation 00671-21 Charlesworth v, 1 Accuracy (2019), Resolved – IPSO mediation 00396-21 Khan v Birmingham Mail, 1 Accuracy (2019), Resolved – IPSO mediation 28491-20 Simmons v, 1 Accuracy (2019), No breach – after investigation. 12352-20 Hewitt… [read post]
6 Jan 2021, 4:00 am by Deanne Sowter
In 2010, the Uniform Collaborative Law Act (“UCLA”) was made available to state legislatures, effectively ending the debate. [read post]
23 Dec 2020, 10:07 pm by Kluwer Patent blogger
The article discusses the divergences between various states in their interpretation of CJEU jurisprudence and the importance of the – then – upcoming judgment of the UK Supreme Court in Unwired Planet v Huawei. [read post]
20 Dec 2020, 12:30 pm by Giles Peaker
TJ v London & Quadrant Housing Trust, County Court at Central London, 18 November 2020, HHJ Saggerson. [read post]
18 Dec 2020, 7:48 am by Joy Waltemath
Simmons-Harris (536 U.S. 639 (2002)) by removing the requirement that beneficiaries have at least one secular option; Clarify the existing provision that a faith-based organization participating in an indirect federal financial assistance program or activity need not modify its program to accommodate a beneficiary, so that it expressly states that such an organization need not modify its policies that require attendance in “all activities that are fundamental to the … [read post]