Search for: "State v. Simmons" Results 221 - 240 of 798
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Feb 2017, 3:40 pm by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Indeed, this amendment conforms to the California Supreme Court’s decision in Duran v. [read post]
17 Feb 2017, 1:34 pm by Bill Marler
Beginning in September 2016, several states, CDC, and the FDA investigated a multistate outbreak of foodborne hepatitis A. [read post]
16 Feb 2017, 12:10 pm by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Indeed, this amendment conforms to the California Supreme Court’s decision in Duran v. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
The system was attacked as a violation of the separation of church and state in Zelman v. [read post]
3 Dec 2016, 10:02 am
Announcing JIPLP Conference on the Present and Future of EU and UK CopyrightThe Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice (JIPLP) conference will take place Monday, 16 January 2017 at the Simmons & Simmons offices in London. [read post]
13 Nov 2016, 6:13 am by Brooke
Meigs, Lincoln’s General, Master Builder of the Union Army is also reviewed in the newspaper.Nicholas Syrett's American Child Bride: A History of Minors and Marriage in the United States is reviewed at Slate. [read post]
9 Sep 2016, 1:51 pm by Bill Otis
Crook, the Supreme Court, by a vote of 5 to 4, relies on "international opinion" to overturn its own precedent and to rule (in Roper v. [read post]
15 Aug 2016, 7:05 am
On 28 July last, the IPKat and Simmons & Simmons co-hosted a panel discussion between Simon Malynicz QC (3 New Square), Lauri Rechardt (IFPI's Director of Licensing and Legal Policy) and Eleonora Rosati (IPKat), chaired by Darren Meale (Simmons & Simmons), on the implications of the recent Court of Appeal judgment in Cartier [noted here].The following is a review of the event by Jonathan… [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 11:22 am by MBettman
On July 28, 2016, the Supreme Court of Ohio handed down a merit decision in State v. [read post]
21 Jul 2016, 1:22 am
 Infringement - The de minimis principle in quia timet actionsThe de minimis principle has been considered in previous patent authorities (Hoechst v BP [1998], Monsanto v Cargill [2007], Napp v Ratiopharm [2009], Lundbeck v Norpharma [2011]). [read post]