Search for: "State v. Simpson" Results 361 - 380 of 730
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Sep 2013, 12:19 pm
  The standard for showing ineffective assistance of counsel rising to a level that violates a defendant's constitutional rights to such a degree that would require a defendant to obtain a new trial is set forth in the 1984 United States Supreme Court decision of Strickland v. [read post]
14 May 2013, 12:30 am by Rumpole
 Legally, the Supreme Court decided Roe v. [read post]
12 May 2013, 4:28 pm by Cynthia Alkon
  Simpson is reportedly stating that if the offer had been conveyed, he would have taken it rather than going forward with trial. [read post]
24 Apr 2013, 7:20 am by Simon Chester
Catherine McKinnon summarized the state of initiatives relating to the use of technology in court processes. [read post]
7 Apr 2013, 7:26 pm
  He described the circuit split leading to FTC v Actavis currently pending in the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 11:00 am by Legal Beagle
Macreath was represented at the Court of Session by Edinburgh law firm Simpson & Marwick, one of whose partners told MSPs at the Scottish Parliament HERE that ‘asbestos is good for you’. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 2:06 pm by Bexis
  We already did that in connection with the original decision in Conte v. [read post]
9 Jan 2013, 10:09 am by WSLL
Simpson of Simpson, Kepler & Edwards, LLC The Cody, Wyoming division of Burg Simpson Eldredge Hersh and Jardine, P.C. [read post]