Search for: "State v. Sinclair" Results 21 - 40 of 255
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jun 2011, 3:02 am by sally
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Sinclair Collis Ltd, R (on the application of) v The Secretary of State for Health [2011] EWCA Civ 437 (17 June 2011) Zinda v The Governing Body of Barn Hill Community High & Ors [2011] EWCA Civ 690 (17 June 2011) High Court (Administrative Court) Bramall v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government & Anor [2011] EWHC 1531 (Admin) (17 June 2011) High Court (Commercial Court) Beazley… [read post]
16 Mar 2010, 11:23 pm by johntfloyd
This belief can be traced to a 2002 decision by the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals in State v. [read post]
29 May 2010, 7:46 am by johntfloyd
Indefinite Detention: Preemptive Punishment for Future Sex Crimes By: Houston Criminal Attorney John Floyd and Paralegal Billy Sinclair On May 17, 2010 the United States Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 2:52 pm by johntfloyd
Abandoning Miranda in Terrorism Cases Contrary to Constitution and Beginning of Slippery Slope towards Neo-Con Police State By: Houston Criminal Attorney John Floyd and Paralegal Billy Sinclair The United States Supreme Court in 1966 handed down Miranda v. [read post]
24 Nov 2011, 1:43 am by sally
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Willett, R v [2011] EWCA Crim 2710 (23 November 2011) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Glatt v Sinclair [2011] EWCA Civ 1317 (23 November 2011) Sharma & Anor v Simposh Ltd [2011] EWCA Civ 1383 (23 November 2011) Schutz (UK) Ltd v Werit UK Ltd & Anor [2011] EWCA Civ 1337 (22 November 2011) High Court (Administrative Court) Elvington Park Ltd v Secretary of State for Communities & Anor… [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 2:52 pm by johntfloyd
Court of Appeals, Third Circuit, in Schneyder v. [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 3:21 pm by johntfloyd
The United States Supreme in 1984 handed down Strickland v. [read post]
11 May 2011, 12:13 am by johntfloyd
Extended Border Search Doctrine: Suspicionless Searches of Computers and Cameras Need not be Conducted at Time and Place of Entry By: Houston Criminal Lawyer John Floyd and Paralegal Billy Sinclair It was a case of “first impression” for the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals—the case of United States v. [read post]