Search for: "State v. Singh" Results 1 - 20 of 531
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Dec 2008, 11:57 pm
Continuing from my previous post, it is high time that the case of Kartar Singh v. [read post]
17 Aug 2017, 4:21 pm by INFORRM
In Singh v Weayou [2017] EWHC 2102 (QB), the Claimant Keith Singh, a Night Services Coordinator at the Priory Hospital in Roehampton, sued the Defendant Joseph Weayou, a Health Care Assistant at the same hospital, for libel and malicious falsehood in respect of an email Mr Weayou had sent on 24 August 2015 to the HR Manager and a senior manager at the hospital. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 1:30 pm by bricitro
Singh has previously testified before the United States Congress on the subject of prisoner abuse and torture associated with the Bush Administration’s application of “enhanced interrogation techniques. [read post]
7 Sep 2007, 1:43 pm
No biggie.Then Singh's attorney files a motion to obtain EAJA fees of $3800. [read post]
20 Aug 2014, 9:52 pm by Steven D. Schwinn
Singh that while Manmohan Singh enjoyed head-of-state immunity from suit in U.S. federal court for acts committed while he... [read post]
28 Oct 2020, 12:30 pm
  (The defendant here was admitted on a tourist visa, but came to the United States pretty much weekly.) [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 2:36 pm by Tarunabh Khaitan
The following are the most important orders given by the Justices Sudershan Reddy and Surinder Singh Nijjar of the Supreme Court in the case of Nandini Sundar v State of Chattisgarh (2011):1. [read post]
17 Jul 2008, 1:32 pm
Singh, No. 07-30150 (7-17-08). [read post]
15 Feb 2015, 10:40 am
It is not clear whether the State satisfied the court on this issue. [read post]
4 Oct 2014, 1:57 am by INFORRM
Hardeep Singh is a freelance journalist and defendant in His Holiness v Singh, he tweets @singhtwo2 This post originally appeared on the Press Gazette’s Wire Blog and is reproduced with permission and thanks. [read post]
9 Feb 2010, 3:42 am by Tarunabh Khaitan
In its recent judgment in Mulla v State of UP, the Supreme Court has continued with the trend of emphasising the extremely limited scope of the rarest of rare doctrine first formulated in Bachan Singh.This blog has noted Justice Sinha's contribution to the death penalty debate, where he repeatedly emphasised the fundamental precondition in Bachan Singh---that rarest of rare case will be one where 'the alternative option [of life imprisonment] is unquestionably foreclosed.'… [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 2:23 pm
The Delhi High Court seemingly walked that path in Koul v Estate Officer noting “refugees and IDPs appear to be similarly situated”. [read post]
29 Nov 2007, 4:32 pm
The Right to Remain Silent The Toronto Star published an editorial on R v. [read post]