Search for: "State v. Singh"
Results 61 - 80
of 840
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jan 2008, 7:36 pm
Boyd is fine with deporting Singh on the basis of his medical claims alone, and cites the Supreme Court case Canada (Attorney General) v. [read post]
24 Aug 2014, 10:36 am
See, eg, Rosenberg v. [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 8:26 am
A bench comprising Justice V S Sirpurkar upheld the judgement of Orissa High Court saying that the impugned judgement does not call for any interference from the court. [read post]
7 Apr 2016, 8:35 am
ZM v Secretary of State for the Home Department; HA (Iraq) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 12-14 January 2016. [read post]
13 Sep 2007, 10:49 am
[8] Kartar Singh v. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 1:10 pm
In Oliver Twist or in the modern United States. [read post]
14 Apr 2010, 8:00 am
[Post by Venkat] State v. [read post]
12 May 2014, 10:10 am
In last week’s case (Singh v. [read post]
21 Mar 2017, 9:13 am
On February 22, 2017, the Supreme Court decided Life Technologies Corp. v. [read post]
19 Oct 2018, 6:47 am
United States of America, Plaintiff/Appellee, v. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 4:00 am
Sharp, Comparative Frameworks for a Human Rights-Based Approach to Psychedelics, (March 8, 2024).Barkha Singh, Normalization of the Exceptional State Under Unlawful Activities and Prevention (Amendment) Act, 2019 – Umar Khalid V. [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 2:06 pm
United States. [read post]
6 Jun 2017, 9:32 am
Singh v. [read post]
1 Aug 2008, 10:19 am
High Court (Administrative Court) Watkins-Singh, R (on the application of) v The Governing Body of Aberdare Girls’ High School & Anor [2008] EWHC 1865 (Admin) (29 July 2008) Pinnington, R (on the application of) v Chief Constable of Thames Valley Police [2008] EWHC 1870 (Admin) (31 July 2008) AV & AU v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2008] EWHC 1895 (Admin) (31 July 2008) High Court (Chancery Division) Prudential Plc… [read post]
11 Oct 2016, 9:50 am
In Singh v. [read post]
16 Sep 2021, 11:42 am
In this case, it stated, Mr. [read post]
15 May 2009, 1:02 am
State of Punjab, [AIR 1956 SC 526], Malkiat Singh and Ors. v. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 2:00 am
In regards to the proportionality argument, Lord Clarke stated that, in this case, the absence of a specified time limit for detention does not infringe the principles in R v Governor of Durham Prison, Ex P Hardial Singh [1984] 1 WLR 704. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 7:03 am
By Renu GuptaGuest BloggerThis post refers to Supreme Court's decision in State of Uttaranchal v. [read post]
9 Dec 2016, 9:02 am
The judiciary, right from the famous case of Virsa Singh v State of Punjab 1958 AIR 465 has relied literally on the medical reports to adjudicate the actus reus of the accused and this reliance has been time and again criticized. [read post]
