Search for: "State v. Singh"
Results 121 - 140
of 840
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Mar 2018, 6:46 am
Applying Hardial Singh [1984] 1 WLR 704 and Lumba [2011] UKSC 12, detaining B would exceed the implied limits on the exercise of administrative power to detain for immigration purposes. [read post]
13 Aug 2011, 12:00 am
STATE v. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 5:46 am
") AC32608 - State v. [read post]
5 Nov 2017, 3:31 am
However, Dr Butt’s case seems materially different from British Chiropractic Association v Singh ([2011] 1 WLR 133) which was relied on by the Judge. [read post]
22 Sep 2021, 4:47 am
Agreeing with Lord Sales, she accepted Singh LJ’s jurisdictional reason. [read post]
2 May 2012, 12:26 pm
" US v. [read post]
2 May 2012, 12:26 pm
" US v. [read post]
2 May 2012, 12:26 pm
" US v. [read post]
2 May 2012, 12:26 pm
" US v. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 4:35 pm
s other leading “fair comment” case – BCA v Singh ([2010] EWCA Civ 350). [read post]
27 Apr 2016, 2:15 am
The appellant was diagnosed with severe post-traumatic stress disorder and claimed her immigration detention was contrary to the Hardial Singh principles and contrary to the Secretary of State’s policy in respect of detaining persons suffering with mental illness. [read post]
25 Dec 2023, 10:04 am
Singh, Yukos Capital Limited v The Russian Federation The Swiss Federal Supreme Court Upholds Interim and Final Award in the Yukos Saga Daniel Quintero Botero, Westmoreland v Canada A Precedent against the Transferability of Treaty Claims Matthew Peter Daminato, Whose Bond Is It Anyway? [read post]
22 Feb 2007, 6:49 pm
On Valentine's Day this year, the Supreme Court delivered its decision in the Rajendra Singh Rana case, disqualifying 13 MLAs in the U.P. [read post]
11 Aug 2010, 4:00 am
Contrast that with Nathan, et al. v. [read post]
15 Aug 2018, 5:44 am
He was successful in the High Court before Singh J, who held that the ban did bind the Crown and accordingly quashed the Secretary of State’s decision. [read post]
7 Jun 2013, 12:32 pm
With the Court’s busiest month of the year now underway, Tejinder Singh takes a look back at this week at the Court. [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 4:44 am
Applying Hardial Singh and Lumba [2011] UKSC 12, doing so would exceed the implied limits on the exercise of administrative power to detain for immigration purposes. [read post]
3 Dec 2010, 12:21 am
s other leading “fair comment” case – BCA v Singh ([2010] EWCA Civ 350). [read post]
23 Mar 2013, 2:12 am
The arbitrary and unreasonable use and potential to use this power has resulted in a series of judgments (see, Maru Ram, Dhananjoy Chatterjee, Kehar Singh, Ranga Billa, Swaran Singh, Epuru Sudhakar). [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 5:18 am
In this context, consider the following from Satterwhite v. [read post]
