Search for: "State v. Singh" Results 161 - 180 of 840
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Apr 2010, 5:15 pm by INFORRM
  The contrast with the approach of the Court of Appeal in British Chiropractic Assocation v Singh is instructive. [read post]
15 May 2017, 3:32 am by Peter Mahler
In Lewis v Alcobi, 2017 NY Slip Op 30664(U) [Sup Ct NY County Apr. 6, 2017], Manhattan Commercial Division Justice Anil C. [read post]
15 May 2017, 3:32 am by Peter Mahler
In Lewis v Alcobi, 2017 NY Slip Op 30664(U) [Sup Ct NY County Apr. 6, 2017], Manhattan Commercial Division Justice Anil C. [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 9:30 pm by ernst
  Georgetown Law observes the centennial of United States v. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 3:43 am by Adam Wagner
Lumba (WL) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] UKSC 12 (23 March 2011) – Read judgment / press summary The Supreme Court has ruled that it was unlawful and a “serious abuse of power” for the Home Office to follow an unpublished policy on the detention of foreign national prisoners which contradicted its published policy. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 10:01 pm by Rachel Marcus
(R(I) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2002] EWCA Civ 888). [read post]
10 Oct 2019, 10:19 am
Contents include:Hans Corell, UN Security Council Reform—The Council Must Lead by Example Michael Wood, Lessons from the ILC’s Work on ‘Immunity of State Officials’: Melland Schill Lecture, 21 November 2017 Mohit Khubchandani, The United States and the Paris Agreement on Climate Change Andrea Carcano, On the Governance of International Judicial Institutions: The Development of Performance Indicators for the International Criminal Court Carolin Mai Weber,… [read post]
24 Oct 2016, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
This Article seeks to address that question by examining two early twentieth-century cases involving the naturalization of Indian immigrants in the United States.In United States v. [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 2:49 pm by Stephen Bilkis
People v Singh ruled that evidence of which a defendant has knowledge, or should reasonably have known of, is not Brady material. [read post]
29 Jul 2008, 3:42 pm
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Cantrell v Wycombe District Council [2008] EWCA Civ 866 (29 July 2008) Bailey v The Ministry of Defence & Anor [2008] EWCA Civ 883 (29 July 2008) Blyth Valley Borough Council v Persimmon Homes (North East) Ltd & Ors [2008] EWCA Civ 861 (29 July 2008) Redcar & Cleveland Borough Council v Bainbridge & Ors (”Bainbridge 1″) [2008] EWCA Civ 885 (29 July 2008) G, R (on the application… [read post]
2 Oct 2011, 10:07 am by Rachit Buch
Mahajna v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWHC 2481 (Admin) (30 September 2011). [read post]
1 Aug 2013, 6:38 am by Dan Stein
Coverage of the Court continues to focus on the fallout from its recent decisions in United States v. [read post]
15 Nov 2021, 3:30 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
 Matter of People v Northern Leasing Sys., Inc., 193 AD3d at 77-78; see generally Singh v Sukhram, 56 AD3d at 192; Alfred Weissman Real Estate v Big V Supermarkets, 268 AD2d at 109-110). [read post]