Search for: "State v. Singleton" Results 101 - 120 of 181
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Dec 2011, 6:48 pm by Steve Vladeck
Three weeks ago, CAAF granted review in United States v. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 11:08 am by Joel R. Brandes
In any event, the Appellate Division stated that his contention was without merit because the father's income for the purpose of calculating his child support obligation includes imputed income (Family Ct Act 413[1][b][5][iv], [v] ), and thus his income was above the federal poverty income guidelines (see generally s 413[1][g]; Matter of Julianska v. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 11:08 am by Joel R. Brandes
In any event, the Appellate Division stated that his contention was without merit because the father's income for the purpose of calculating his child support obligation includes imputed income (Family Ct Act 413[1][b][5][iv], [v] ), and thus his income was above the federal poverty income guidelines (see generally s 413[1][g]; Matter of Julianska v. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 3:45 am by Russ Bensing
Singleton (discussed here), since his first sentence was prior to July 1, 2006, but that was before State v. [read post]
12 Jun 2011, 12:41 pm by Brian Van Vleck
The Kelley Court also acknowledges that it creates a split with the Second District's 2006 opinion in Singleton v. [read post]