Search for: "State v. Sinner"
Results 21 - 40
of 66
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Mar 2017, 9:01 pm
Because these are sinners, but they are special sinners because their sins relate to being gay, and the “need” to avoid involvement with LGBTQ is paramount. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 9:01 pm
Because these are sinners, but they are special sinners because their sins relate to being gay, and the “need” to avoid involvement with LGBTQ is paramount. [read post]
10 Mar 2017, 2:00 am
Have you read the United States Supreme Court’s opinion in Pena-Rodriguez v. [read post]
10 Mar 2017, 2:00 am
Have you read the United States Supreme Court’s opinion in Pena-Rodriguez v. [read post]
5 Sep 2015, 12:09 am
No, it seems it is you that are confused about "marriage' that churches will perform with marriage on behalf of her employer, not me.Well, I can see that we disagree as to who is confused, but beyond that, you do not explain your position further, so you have given me nothing to which to reply (except as you take up this subject again, later in your response as quoted below).You don't need to remind me of Plessy v Ferguson, and, as you say it was 'upheld' by… [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 8:22 am
In Burwell v. [read post]
23 Oct 2014, 10:41 am
The majority concluded that, under Feiner v. [read post]
27 Aug 2014, 11:14 am
The majority concluded that, under Feiner v. [read post]
19 Mar 2014, 1:42 am
In addressing the very nature of human rights law, Lord Reed called with approval upon the words of Lord Cooke in R (Daly) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2001] 2 AC 532: “The truth is, I think, that some rights are inherent and fundamental to democratic civilised society. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 8:27 am
The threshold issue in Sebelius v. [read post]
30 Sep 2013, 5:37 am
For example, you could refer to it as a felony, but the meaning of felony varies from state to state. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 10:41 am
Writing at Balkinization, Jason Mazzone notes that the Westboro Baptist Church, infamous for picketing funerals for a variety of bizarre and hateful reasons, has filed an amicus brief in United States v. [read post]
14 Jan 2013, 6:30 am
(Swanner v. [read post]
1 Oct 2012, 11:54 pm
Lakshmanan Fireworks Industries v. [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 1:55 pm
” This column by Steven Greenhut is a good summary of the problem: Few groups of “sinners” were singled out in biblical accounts more than “tax collectors,” who were not merely state agents collecting revenues that taxpayers rightfully owed to the government. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 2:29 pm
In State v. [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 9:42 am
The result of this confusion is that LGBT's see themselves as "victims", and people like V. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 10:01 pm
Hardin v. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 12:27 pm
Supreme Court, United States v. [read post]
