Search for: "State v. Slater" Results 41 - 60 of 155
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Apr 2016, 4:00 am by Administrator
” … Double AspectState v. [read post]
7 Jul 2013, 9:01 pm by Abigail Slater
The United States Court of Appeals for the D.C. [read post]
31 Mar 2012, 5:10 am by Paul M. Secunda
The Western District of Wisconsin issued its much anticipated opinion in WEAC v. [read post]
22 Apr 2013, 4:00 am by Administrator
Rule of LawSabey v. [read post]
19 Jul 2017, 3:47 am by Ben
And in Access Copyright v. [read post]
20 Jun 2021, 5:04 am by INFORRM
In the Law Times David Slater analyses the state of defamation was, using the spate of Trump 2020 election fraud claims as an example. [read post]
23 Nov 2013, 4:30 am by Karen Tani
Kershaw, Organizing the Neoliberal State in the US, 1971-1976 Public Sector Unions and the State Barry Eidlin -- Network Rep, Creator, OrganizerJoseph Slater -- Discussant, ChairAlexis Walker, Solidarity’s Wedge: How the Federalized Nature of American Labor Law Divides Public and Private Sector UnionsNicholas Juravich, A Union of Paraprofessionals? [read post]
21 Aug 2020, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
When Mr Craig released a pamphlet stating that the allegations were lies, this drew a counterclaim from Mr Slater. [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 5:58 am
The same could not be said for the recent proceedings between Stephen Slater and Per Wimmer which came before Judge Birss QC in the Patents County Court: Slater v Wimmer [2012] EWPCC 7 (16 February 2012). [read post]
24 May 2018, 9:42 am by John Delaney
So, with that background, you’ll understand why it is with some trepidation that I turn to recent developments in Naruto v. [read post]
27 Sep 2015, 5:54 am
  There could be a third argument- i.e. that they both had the same idea, contributed significant relevant originality (Brighton v Jones [2004]) and, in fact, the selfies are works of joint authorship; there being collaboration present and no need for an intention to create a joint work (Beckingham v Hodgens [2002]). [read post]
22 Jul 2016, 8:37 am by Andrew Hamm
During his stint at the Department of Justice, Sanford also participated in the only criminal trial ever held by the Supreme Court: United States v. [read post]
12 Jun 2007, 3:01 pm
It is entirely possible for an offer to be suitable but not ‘reasonable to accept’, as this latter is a subjective test (Slater v LB Lewisham (2006) [2006] EWCA Civ 394). [read post]
24 Mar 2013, 4:06 pm by Jacek Stramski
By Dwight Slater Thought the fight over the 2012 redistricting process was over? [read post]