Search for: "State v. Slater"
Results 61 - 80
of 183
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 May 2018, 9:42 am
So, with that background, you’ll understand why it is with some trepidation that I turn to recent developments in Naruto v. [read post]
22 Jul 2016, 8:37 am
During his stint at the Department of Justice, Sanford also participated in the only criminal trial ever held by the Supreme Court: United States v. [read post]
12 Jun 2007, 3:01 pm
It is entirely possible for an offer to be suitable but not ‘reasonable to accept’, as this latter is a subjective test (Slater v LB Lewisham (2006) [2006] EWCA Civ 394). [read post]
27 Sep 2015, 5:54 am
There could be a third argument- i.e. that they both had the same idea, contributed significant relevant originality (Brighton v Jones [2004]) and, in fact, the selfies are works of joint authorship; there being collaboration present and no need for an intention to create a joint work (Beckingham v Hodgens [2002]). [read post]
24 Mar 2013, 4:06 pm
By Dwight Slater Thought the fight over the 2012 redistricting process was over? [read post]
11 Aug 2014, 4:24 am
Automated Solutions Corporation v. [read post]
1 May 2024, 2:07 pm
” In reaching this conclusion, the Copyright Office relies on the case of Naruto v. [read post]
18 Jul 2017, 5:27 am
The case is Callaghan v. [read post]
5 Nov 2015, 8:01 am
Slater, Ph.D., P.E., a professional engineering expert witness stating that his opinion is based on speculation and is not reliable. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 5:17 am
State Farm Fire & Gas. [read post]
14 Jun 2017, 6:06 am
Slater. [read post]
7 Mar 2018, 6:19 pm
Last week, the United States Supreme Court considered the case of Janus v. [read post]
28 Jul 2014, 6:45 am
Boehm v. [read post]
23 Mar 2019, 6:39 am
[On March 5, 2019], in Singh v. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 6:46 am
Arkansas, in which the Court will hear arguments on issues relating to jury deadlocks, mistrials, and double jeopardy, while Max Slater of JURIST reports that Arizona attorneys have filed their opening brief in Arizona v. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 2:43 am
| 3-D Lego trade mark | Garcia v Google | B+ subgroup | EU trade mark reform and counterfeits in transit | French v Battistelli | US v Canada over piracy | UK Supreme Court in Starbucks | BASCA v The Secretary of State for Business | Patent litigation, music, politics | Product placement in Japan. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 3:29 pm
See Fogerty v. [read post]
29 Feb 2008, 5:44 pm
The order granted a hearing en banc for potential reconsideration of its controversial 1998 decision in State Street Bank & Trust Co. v. [read post]
23 Mar 2020, 5:26 pm
Canada Slater Vecchio LLP v Arvanitis 2020 BCSC 385 a case In the Supreme Court of the British Columbia, where a law firm, who previously represented a defendant, brought a defamation action against her. [read post]
18 Mar 2008, 4:48 am
In other words, they can throw the entire issue back to the District of Columbia (which is not a State of the United States) or to the States. [read post]
